An email from a woman immigrant: Jungle law in Finland
Some foreigners and immigrants give birth to babies near-constantly and therefore are unemployed. After 15, 10 or 7 years they enroll in a Finnish-language course and complain that they don’t learn a thing. They claim that Finnish is too difficult to learn.
Some Finns are more than happy to hear that their langauge is too difficult to learn. Only intelligent people can speak such a difficult langauge, right? Another matter that makes them happy is that you’ll be unemployed since your knowledge of Finland is still elementary. You won’t be competing anytime soon for the same jobs as them.
Somebody like me appears and wants to improve her life but can’t change anything. It’s how jungle law functions in Finland:
- The government and system loathe you. They think we are all doing the same thing (living off welfare) and we’re all the same;
- That’s why some are so hostile to immigrants, especially if you try to find work or try to learn more Finnish;
- In the meantime, while you live off welfare, you’re supposed to work for peanuts. Your daily wages amount to 9 euros and you work from 8am to 4-5pm;
- There are immigrants who stay at home and complain near-constantly that they are sick, have a headache, have to take care of their baby or make up some other excuse to not go to work or class to learn more Finnish;
- Since they live frugally they have a lot of money in the bank and don’t really need to work at all. Why should they?
- These types of immigrants abuse the law and system. Those like me, who don’t want to play this game, are singled out by the government, social workers, courts and police for standing up for our rights;
- Those immigrants that never complain to anyone would never touch Migrant Tales with a ten-foot pole;
- They just say everything is fine in Finland. It’s the best country in the world and everything is fine because they can take a long rest and do nothing;
- To conclude, the social welfare system awards those that lie and punishes those that are honest.
Finns have a right to be angry at lazy people on welfare. I agree with them but they attack me and others who want to change matters. I would love to work and stop depending on social welfare.
There are two enemies out there: Immigrants and the social welfare system.
The solution? Change is only possible if I am accepted by society. Secondly, I must change my life completely. I need to get a job or establish a business so I can attain the Finnish immigrant dream: have my own apartment, raise a family, and bring my parents to this country.
All this requires money. Getting a real job or establishing a business. In other words: money.
Kun Suomi ei ole oikea vastaus
Olin mennyt viettämään koulujen päättäjäisiä yhteen puistoon. Kun olin jo jonkin aikaa jutellut yhden lukiolaisen kanssa, hän alkoi kysyä mistä vanhempani ovat tulleet. Vastasin Suomesta. Se on teknisesti totta koska olen adoptoitu. Sitten hän kysyi missä heidän vanhempansa tulevat. Vastasin Suomesta tietty. Sitten hän jatkoi juttelua muista asioista.
Itselleni jäi ikävä tunne suuhun siitä. Miksi minun pitäisi alkaa selitellä mistä minun vanhemmat on. Toinen oli miksi hän ei uskonut, että vanhempani voisivat olla Suomesta. Tämä oli kuin jostakin stereotyyppisestä keskustelusta, jossa värillinen joutuu selittämään mistä tulee ja nykyinen asuinmaa ei ole oikea vastaus. Olisin kyllä voinut vain sanoa heidän olevan Kiinasta niin asia olisi mennyt ihan helposti ohi ilman lisämutkia. Mutta ei nyt viitsinyt alkaa valehdella. Mitä se kertoo Suomesta jos kelpaava vastaus ei ole Suomi? Ovatko nuoret nyt yhtään sen vähemmän rasistisempia.
Tämä tapahtuma olisi voinut olla olankohautus juttu, jos se olisi ollut vain yksittäinen tapaus, mutta tämä on kohtuu normaalia, jos päättää liikkua kadulla ja olla sosiaalinen. Parasta varmaan olla epäsosiaalinen niin välttyisin tällaisilta kohtauksilta.
Migrant Tales February 1, 2012: Why write about a Somali immigrant who died in Oulu, Finland?
One of the matters that has surprised me after Migrant Tales scooped more information about the tragic death of a Somali national in Oulu on February 1 is the lack of empathy for the victim. Finland and the Nordic region have not been the same after the April election and when Anders Breivik went on the rampage in Norway in July killing 77 victims.
In both cases above, anti-immigration and anti-Muslim rhetoric played a role.
One gets the impression by reading some of the threads on Migrant Tales and My Finland is International that since what happened in Oulu wasn’t considered a hate crime by the police, we should not give it much importance.
Abdisalam Mohamed Abdulahi was one of three young Muslim victims who was killed in Finland’s Black February.
Some have even gone as far as to claim that the tragedy in Oulu had nothing to do with immigration or racism.
I beg your pardon!?
What happened in Oulu had everything to do with immigrants and the social ills that threaten our society today.
We are proud that we can speak out for the victim and share on this blog our sorrow for what happened.
Add to what happened in Oulu the horrific events in Norway in summer 2011 and Finland’s ever-worsening atmosphere for immigrants and minorities, it is only natural that we react to a crime involving an immigrant, especially one where three Finns break into his home by force and perpetrated his death.
Migrant Tales will continue to report crimes against immigrants and hopes it will have the opportunity to do so in the future.
Somali taxi driver assaulted in Helsinki
A Somali taxi driver was assaulted by two Finnish men on Thursday at 4:30am at the Helsinki Railway Station, according to a Migrant Tales reporter. The man was taken to hospital by ambulance with injuries to the lower jaw and chin. The two attackers were later apprehended by the police.
The victim, who was second in a taxi line waiting for customers, was approached by two men who asked if they could be taken to an unknown destination.
“I said ok and waited for a couple of minutes for them to enter the car because they were chatting between themselves,” he said. “I got suspicious and decided against taking them because I feared that I could be robbed [or beaten up]. When I got out of the car and told them I’d refuse to take them anywhere, they attacked [me on the spot] and threatened to kill me.”
The taxi driver said that the two attackers called him the n-word and told him to go back to the country he came from.
The man was taken to hospital by ambulance. He was released the following day and is presently recovering at home.
Which party should I vote for in the Finnish municipal elections of October?
Which political party should I vote for in the upcoming municipal elections of October? If you are an immigrant or a naturalized Finn, probably one criterion is the party’s record on immigration and cultural diversity.
The first important decision you should make, however, is to vote on October 28.
Very few immigrants vote in municipal elections. In 2008, only 19.6% voted compared with 60% Finnish citizens.
Those eligible to vote are:
- Finnish citizens;
- Citizens of the European Union, Norway and Iceland;
- Other nationalities that have lived permanently in Finland at least two years.
While all political parties in Finland are officially against all forms of discrimination, it’s not clear what their real views are on the issue. How do they promote cultural diversity and how often do they speak out against racism?
The Christian Democrats are a case in point. They promote Christian values but there is not too much brotherly love shown by Interior Minister Päivi Räsänen when it comes to gays and refugee minors from Somalia who want to be reunited with their families.
The Center Party, Social Democrats and National Coalition Party (Kokoomus) suffer from the same type of split political personality as the Christian Democrats. You will find in all of these parties members who are for and against immigrants and immigration. No other party has, however, so many openly anti-immigration members as the Perussuomalaiset (PS).
The PS is the only party in Finland that has capitalized politically on anti-immigration and especially anti-Muslim sentiment as we saw in last year’s parliamentary elections.
The Greens and Swedish People’s Parties, and even the Left Wing Alliance with some reservations, appear to be the most open to immigration and cultural diversity, according to some polls.
This municipal election poll was published by Helsingin Sanomat.
One matter that concerns me the most about all of the parties I mentioned is that none of them speak specifically about the need in our ever-growing culturally diverse society for mutual acceptance, respect and equal opportunities.
What are some good questions you could ask a Finnish political party as the municipal elections near?
One question would be their big picture of Finnish society in this century. What is their stand on cultural diversity? How is our culturally diverse society supposed to function? Is it something that should be promoted or discouraged?
If they promote cultural diversity, the second question should be how. If they are against it, ask them what they plan to do with those people who live here and aren’t white Finns.
Remember to vote on October 28!
Blaming undocumented immigrants is sweeping the issue under the rug
The treatment of an ever-growing problem like undocumented immigrants in Finland by the media and politicians resembles a debate where nobody really wants to tackle the issue. Our attention too often shifts to the undocumented immigrant, who is seen as the culprit and root of the problem.
The ongoing debate resembles discussing the reasons behind prostitution. Is is the woman’s fault for offering sex or the customer’s who buys such services from her? Who is to blame: demand, supply, or both?
Another problem with the debate on undocumented workers in Finland and Europe is terminology. The media and the rest of the public use a dehumanizing slur like “illegal.” Calling a human “illegal” is wrong and not only permits the employer to wash his hands of the problem, but is disrespectful. It opens the door to ethnic profiling and victimization of groups like immigrants.
If we take an extreme case like the United States, where there are an estimated 11-12 million undocumented workers, the answer why this type of activity takes place is clear: Businesses and the economy benefit immensely from undocumented workers.
As long as there are clear economic benefits for employers and the economy to hire undocumented workers, it’s wishful thinking that the issue will magically disappear. Moreover, our attention should shift to the real culprit, the employer, rather than victimize undocumented workers.
Certainly undocumented workers are part of the problem but not in the same degree as employers, who have more resources and choices open to them than undocumented immigrants.
The first time I knew of an undocumented worker in Finland was in the 1980s. He worked for a restaurant called Mexicana in Helsinki. The cook, a Mexican, complained about low wages, long hours and how he had to sleep at the restaurant.
Whatever your view of this serious problem, a good and effective way to begin understanding and tackling it is by asking why this type of activity happens too often right under our noses.
Otavan Sanomat: Kahden kulttuurin välillä
Taw Reh
Jokainen maahanmuuttaja oppii elämään kahden kulttuurin välillä. Joillekin se on helppoa, kun taas toiselle se on vaikeampi prosessi. Monella pakolaisilla ei kuitenkaan ole paljon valinnanvaraa: lähtö entisestä kotimaasta voi olla elämän ja kuoleman kysymys, jos maassa on sisällissota tai ihmisoikeuksia ei kunnioiteta.
Suomi ottaa vuosittain 750 kiintiöpakolaista, mutta turvapaikanhakijoita saattaa olla paljon enemmänkin. Vuonna 2011 heitä oli 3 088. Eniten turvapaikanhakijoita tuli Irakista (586), Somaliasta (356), Venäjältä (296), Afganistanista (284) ja Iranista (124).
Maailman pakolaisista 80 % on Pakistanista, Iranista ja Syyriasta Yhdistyneiden kansakuntien pakolaisjärjestön (UNHCR) mukaan.
Vaikka Suomessa puhutaan paljon maahanmuuttajista ja pakolaisista, pakolaislasten identiteetistä tai heidän entisessä kotimaassaan mahdollisista saaduista traumoista ei keskustella tarpeeksi. Mitä kauemmin hän asuu Suomessa, sitä suurempi mahdollisuus on, että hän saattaa unohtaa omat juurensa ja identiteettinsä.
Hyvä esimerkki on kieli ja kielitaito. Kun pakolaislapsi oppii puhumaan suomea tai ruotsia oma äidinkieli saattaa ruostua tai unohtua. Jos näin tapahtuu, seuraukset voivat olla kohtalokkaita.
On paljon tutkimuksia jotka osoittavat kuinka tärkeä identiteetti on ihmiselle. Jos ihmisillä on vahva identiteetti ja itsetunto, hän myös pystyy omaksumaan ja oppimaan uusia kieliä. Jos ihminen menettää oman identiteettinsä, hänestä voi tulla näkymätön itselleen ja yhteiskunnalle.
Vaikka Suomessa puhutaan monikulttuurisuuden puolesta tai vastaan, eli kulttuurisesta moniarvoisuudesta, unohdetaan yksi tärkeä seikka: monikulttuurisuus vahvistaa ja puolustaa vähemmistöjen identiteettiä.
Suomen valtion on panostettava kaikin keinon pakolaislapsiin, ja erityisesti pakolaislasten identiteetin tukemiseen. Tämä voidaan saavuttaa koulutuksen ja harrastusten kautta. Resursseja tarvitaan paljon enemmän kuin mitä nyt on käytössä.
Syrjäytyneet Suomessa ja epäonnistumisen merkkiä
Meillä on hyvä yhteiskunta Suomessa mutta tämä väite tarvitsee toisen kysymyksen: kenelle? Kannustetaanko todella eri vähemmistöjen oikeuksia elää Suomessa tasavertaisena jäsenenä ja turvallisessa yhteiskunnassa?
Mielestäni kansanedustaja (ps) Reijo Tossavaisen viimeisin blogikirjoitus, Somalien kokemuksia tutkitaan 0,6 milj. eurolla, edustaa sitä Suomea, joka syrjii sanoin toisia.
Tossavainen väittää blogikirjoituksessa, että Suomen Akatemian tutkimushanke somaleista on turhaa, koska olisi ”tähdellisempää tutkia vaikkapa suomalaisnuorten sopeutumisongelmia?”
Mielestäni tutkimalla suomen neljänneksi suurinta maahanmuuttajienryhmää voisi valaista monta tärkeää asiaa. Jos tiedämme paremmin miksi jotkut somalit syrjäytyvät yhteiskunnastamme, voisimme haasta tämä ilmiön ja ongelmaan.
Missä on maa, joka on hyötynyt syrjäämällä toisia ryhmiä? Jos on paljon syrjäytyneitä yhteisnunnassamme, kaikki häviämme ja maksamme kovan veronhinnan tästä.
Niin kauan kun Suomessa on syrjäytyneitä riippumatta taustoista, se on aina epäonnistumisen merkkiä.
OAJ union: Teachers (and immigrants) should report hate speech and harassment cases to the police
Finland’s Trade Union of Education (OAJ) recommends that teachers should file a complaint to the police if they are victims of hate speech or harassment at school, reports Helsingin Sanomat, citing Finnish News Agency (STT). Should immigrants and visible minorities follow OAJ’s example if they are victims of racist harassment in public?
Migrant Tales reported last year on the case of an African student who was harassed and bullied in public in Jyväskylä. Uncertain if the incident should be reported or not, the student got in touch with the police and Ombudsman for Minorities. The police said the student should not report the case but the Ombudsman for Minorities advised to the contrary.
The announcement by OAJ reveals concern about the growing number of hate speech and harassment cases reported by teachers at school. The union recommends teachers to get in touch directly with the police if the perpetrator is 15 years old and with social welfare officials if younger.
Your safety is the most important matter you should keep in mind if somebody harasses you in public. Walk away from the situation but get a good description of the perpetrator so you can report the person to the police.


