Migrant tales
Menu
  • #MakeRacismHistory “In Your Eyes”
  • About Migrant Tales
  • It’s all about Human Rights
  • Literary
  • Migrant Tales Media Monitoring
  • NoHateFinland.org
  • Tales from Europe
Menu

Finnish “mono-” versus “multicultural” debate

Posted on December 20, 2008 by Migrant Tales

There has been an ongoing ping-pong debate on how good or bad is mono versus multiculturalism. I believe that this type of debate is fruitless because European cultures in general and Finland in particular have always been multicultural.

To quote one of our avid “monoculturalist:”

I have no feeling of inferiority, Enrique, quite the opposite. Looking at how horribly you multiculturalists have failed in your nationbuilding, I feel rather secure and superior considering how my country has managed to become wealthy, stable and well functioning. Which is why I oppose your suggestions of bringing that failure to Finland

One of the biggest fallacies that our education in Finland is committing with our children is that they are still being taught that somehow human growth and creativity in Finland tended to occur within separate and isolated cultures. There is little emphasis placed on how Finnish culture/other cultures mixed and formed constantly changing societal variants.

Claude Lévy-Strauss, the dean of structural anthropology who will turn 100 on November 28, speaks about the role of the incest taboo in different society. Apart from genetic disorders, the incest taboo forces — according to Lévy-Strauss — members of a family to marry outside of the group. This means that through marriage a family group becomes more extended by forging new family ties, which help it to survive more effectively.

In my opinion, cultures and societies work in the same way: cultures have for thousands of years been in constant contact with each other through traders, explorers, pirates, travelers, multicultural marriages and in other ways. They have taken part in a sort of dynamic “cultural market place” were we barter and try on new customs, ideas and ways to solve problems in our society more effectively.

One anthropologist mentioned that defenders of the classic view of separate and isolated cultural development believe, incorrectly, that classical Greece sprung from nowhere. However, their growth was not a pure and isolated event, but through Greek encounters with foreigners (traders etc).

So, in many respects, multiculturalism has always existed because humankind has not believed in isolation but on survival. Cultural exchanges, incorporating and trading different parts of our culture not only offers us the exciting prospect to try something new, but offers us an opportunity to create a more resilient and stronger society.

Thanks to multiculturalism we have been able to build diverse societies in Europe, for example, that are in a still in the process of constant change.

However, whenever a group raises the monocultural flag, that usually sparks strife and mass wars. Nazi Germany and the former Yugoslavia are prime examples of this type of “monocultural bullying” and its utter failure as a model.

Category: All categories, Enrique

45 thoughts on “Finnish “mono-” versus “multicultural” debate”

  1. Tiwaz says:
    December 20, 2008 at 12:13 pm

    What you do not grasp, is that forever it has been NATIVES of culture who determine how culture is changed. They decide how they adjust the possible changes and if they take them in. NATIVES.

    Only times foreigners have had any say on how culture changes is when they take over the land inhabited by representatives of other culture. At that point, generally it has meaned annihilation of native culture and replacement it with foreign culture.

    This is what you suggest. Pushing away Finnish cultrue from Finland until there is no longer Finnish culture. It has been wiped out. We Finns do not want to incorporate to our culture what you are offering. We do not barter with our culture on your terms, this is our culture, our society, our country and that means it is OUR call. Not yours.

    Every single time any nation has tried multiculturalism, it has led to conflict as one or more groups inside feel that they are under attack, rightfully or not most usually rightfully, by another culture. And seek to defend their culture and way of life.

    This results in war. Other times, some group uses divisions created by multiculturalism as catalyst for their own agenda. Without these divisions they would not have leverage to push people.

    So failure is upon attempt of forcing different cultures with incompatible values to live together as “equals”. It only leads to situation where both sides are offended as they find themselves insulted by other cultural groups.

    As you have pointed out, Finland HAS other cultural groups inside it’s borders. Has had for ages. But those cultural groups accept that FINNISH cultural norms form the framework in which all cultures act. Sami people do not try to push their culture to Finns, they adjusted their way of life to Finnish culture. Resulting in ability to coexist without conflict.

    If they had not and their culture had been in conflict with Finnish, they would have been wiped out centuries ago.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 20, 2008 at 1:37 pm

      –What you do not grasp, is that forever it has been NATIVES of culture who determine how culture is changed. They decide how they adjust the possible changes and if they take them in. NATIVES.

      Nah, it is the people who form part and identify with a culture. People are smart, cultures pragmatic, they know what is right for them. You cannot control that. It was tried during that period when you grew up in Finland. Restrictions on different nationalities were commonplace. That, in my opinion, was unnatural. Just go to a market place and tell everyone there what they should buy and how they spend their money. It won’t work.

      –This is what you suggest. Pushing away Finnish cultrue from Finland until there is no longer Finnish culture. It has been wiped out. We Finns do not want to incorporate to our culture what you are offering. We do not barter with our culture on your terms, this is our culture, our society, our country and that means it is OUR call. Not yours.

      This is what some call xenophobia.

      –So failure is upon attempt of forcing different cultures with incompatible values to live together as “equals”. It only leads to situation where both sides are offended as they find themselves insulted by other cultural groups.

      This is what some call racism.

      — As you have pointed out, Finland HAS other cultural groups inside it’s borders. Has had for ages. But those cultural groups accept that FINNISH cultural norms form the framework in which all cultures act.

      Then this proves that other cultures can also live in this country harmoniously.

      Reply
  2. JL says:
    December 20, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Firstly, inbreeding is rare not because of “incest taboos” but because of the Westermarck effect.

    As to the rest of your post, you unwittingly demonstrate that immigration is completely unnecessary for transmission of ideas across cultures. Traditionally, people accept those foreign ideas that are deemed useful, and reject others. However, in the era of mass migration this is no longer possible: now we must accept the cultures of foreign peoples in toto as it’s the peoples who now migrate, not ideas. This is particularly problematic because the direction of migration is from the failed Third World cultures to the successful Western ones, which means that the failed ideas of crummy cultures are spread into the West.

    When you painted a glorious picture of the “cultural market place” where different peoples and ideas mingle, you forgot to mention another commonplace of international relations: war. Interaction between different peoples and ethnic groups has always led to conflict and war. A central reason for both WWI and WWII was the historical dispersion of ethnic Germans across numerous European nations. Large groups of different peoples living in the same place is an inherently volatile combination. Yugoslavia is a case in point.

    The genius of the ethnically defined nation-state is that is eliminates that kind volatility and makes it impossible for imperialists to play divide and rule. This is why homogeneous nation states are the happiest, most stable, and wealthy human communities in history. In the immigrant ghettoes of many European cities, you can see the seeds of civil war and tyranny. Multiculturalism is tantamount to war, instability, imperialism, inequality, and poverty.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 20, 2008 at 8:48 pm

      –As to the rest of your post, you unwittingly demonstrate that immigration is completely unnecessary for transmission of ideas across cultures. Traditionally, people accept those foreign ideas that are deemed useful, and reject others. However, in the era of mass migration this is no longer possible: now we must accept the cultures of foreign peoples in toto as it’s the peoples who now migrate, not ideas.

      We live in a globalized world where information and ideas travel rapidly. Ideas come from contact with people and their cultures. Certainly people accept ideas that are useful to them. However, the argument is that many of the ideas, instruments, concepts have sprung and are implanted in our respective cultures hundreds, even thousands of years ago.

      What is called “Western culture” by now is incorporating traditions from faraway places. Our number system derives from India; our alphabet, from the Middle East. A significant amount of the vegetables and crops we grow and consume derive from the native peoples of the Americas.

      –Interaction between different peoples and ethnic groups has always led to conflict and war. A central reason for both WWI and WWII was the historical dispersion of ethnic Germans across numerous European nations. Large groups of different peoples living in the same place is an inherently volatile combination. Yugoslavia is a case in point.

      In a way I agree but the problem of these wars has always been cultural domination, cultural superiority and cultural bullying of minorities. What about if these latter three things did not occur? What about if cultures found common goals? If you live in a globalized world you cannot expect to have high economic growth without importing labor. What are you then going to do with foreign labor? Try to beat it in their heads that they are inferior, less intelligent and culturally clumsy?

      The nation-state has its good and bad points but it is now under strain thanks to our technology, economic growth, etc.

      I don’t buy that homogeneous states are the “happiest.” How do you measure “happiness?” Look what happened to Germany when it shifted to “monoculturalism.” Moreover, there is no such thing as “homogenous” nations. That is a myth. My point is that there is such a thing as the “global village” and the idea that cultures sprung up from nowhere is a lot of hogwash.

      Reply
  3. JL says:
    December 21, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    “We live in a globalized world where information and ideas travel rapidly. Ideas come from contact with people and their cultures. Certainly people accept ideas that are useful to them. However, the argument is that many of the ideas, instruments, concepts have sprung and are implanted in our respective cultures hundreds, even thousands of years ago.”

    Yes, and all this happened for millenia without the ideology of multiculturalism. Why are you trying to conflate mass immigration with the transmission of ideas across cultures, when, by your own words, these two phenomena are not related to each other?

    “In a way I agree but the problem of these wars has always been cultural domination, cultural superiority and cultural bullying of minorities. What about if these latter three things did not occur? What about if cultures found common goals?”

    What if cows could fly? What I don’t understand that when–after millenia of tyranny, wars, oppression, slavery, famine, disease, poverty–people in some corners of the globe have managed to create stable, wealthy, democratic nation-states, folks like you find it necessary that these nation-states be destroyed so that some pie-in-the-sky kumbaya utopia could be realised. For us Finns the Finnish nation is exactly the place where we are shielded from “cultural domination, cultural superiority and cultural bullyig of minorities”, i.e. the things we were subjected to for most of our history. But for you this “lintukoto” is intolerable, and Finns have an obligation to let their nation be colonized by foreigners.

    If you live in a globalized world you cannot expect to have high economic growth without importing labor. What are you then going to do with foreign labor? Try to beat it in their heads that they are inferior, less intelligent and culturally clumsy?

    Firstly, the idea that high economic growth trumps concerns such as cultural continuity, equitable division of income, and labor rights, is revolting to me. Secondly, the labor shortage story is the biggest lie of our time, along with the related lies about multiculturalism. Finland suffers from mass unemployment at the moment, and in coming years the global recession will likely wipe out hundreds of thousands of jobs more. The immigrant unemployment rate is even higher than the native one, meaning that there is no demand for their labor except as a reserve that serves to lower wages.

    Just about any job opening offering livable wage in Finland gets dozens if not hundreds of applicants. You have to be a moron to believe that there’s labor shortage in Finland. And by the way, the biggest baby boomer generations have already retired for the most part, without affecting the unemployment rate in any significant way.

    “I don’t buy that homogeneous states are the “happiest.” How do you measure “happiness?” Look what happened to Germany when it shifted to “monoculturalism.””

    Well, of course studies of happiness are problematic because happiness is subjective, but here’s the top ten from one study:

    * 1 Denmark
    * 2 Switzerland
    * 3 Austria
    * 4 Iceland
    * 5 Bahamas
    * 6 Finland
    * 7 Sweden
    * 8 Bhutan
    * 9 Brunei
    * 10 Canada (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-is-the-worlds-happiest-country–official-410075.html)

    The homogeneous nation-state = happiness connection is not in any manner perfect (Asian cultures in general aren’t happy), but there’s something to it. However, the more objective studies such as the Human Development Index indicate the superiority of ethnic nation states.

    Your knowledge of history seems to very shallow, as Nazi Germany is the only historical example you constantly bring up. Ever heard of Godwin’s Law? There are hundreds of nationalisms in the world, and all you can think of is Nazism.

    “Moreover, there is no such thing as “homogenous” nations. That is a myth. My point is that there is such a thing as the “global village” and the idea that cultures sprung up from nowhere is a lot of hogwash.”

    By homogeneous nations I mean nations where one ethnicity is overwhelmingly numerous, and calls the shots. This is not incompatible with giving minorities rights, as has happened with the small historical minorities in Finland. If however the minorities grow uncontrollably the entire basis of the nation crumbles.

    Where is this “global village” located? I’d like to visit it. Your stuff about cultures springing up from nowhere is a strawman, and has nothing to do with multiculturalism; I don’t know why you keep bringing it up.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 21, 2008 at 8:23 pm

      –Your knowledge of history seems to very shallow, as Nazi Germany is the only historical example you constantly bring up. Ever heard of Godwin’s Law? There are hundreds of nationalisms in the world, and all you can think of is Nazism.

      That’s funny that you say that. One of my pet areas is World War 2. I think it is extremely important and due to the mass systematic extermination of people it is in its own league. The purges of the 1930s in the former Soviet Union were just as bad. However, none really compares to what happened during the Nazi era. I mentioned it as an chronic aberration since we should not forget what collective hysteria, madness and racial laws/racism can bring. There is also the genocide of the Armenians of Turks, Hutus and Tutsies etc. However, tell me where systematic mass murder has been committed on such a grand scale as in Nazi Germany?

      Reply
    2. Enrique says:
      December 21, 2008 at 8:24 pm

      What is your definition of multiculturalism? Do you mean the Canadian policy of multiculturalism or just multicultural society? Do you believe in integration, assimilation or acculturation? How much should a minority adapt to the majority culture?

      Reply
  4. JL says:
    December 21, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    The various genocides in Mao’s China, Stalin’s Soviet Union, and Pol Pot’s Cambodia were of similar scale as the Holocaust. All those murderous regimes were celebrated by the leftist intelligentsia as superbly progressive. Today’s leftist intelligentsia promotes multiculturalism, and this will lead to atrocities on a grand scale, too.

    By multiculturalism I mean simply the ideology that stuffing lots of people of various races and ethnicities in the same place is in itself a desirable thing, rather than a potentially ruinous policy. Immigrants should change their ways in order to fit in the host society, not the other way round. A liberal society like Finland offers ample room for sub-cultures as it is, and there is no need to change anything so as to appease immigrants.

    Reply
  5. Tiwaz says:
    December 22, 2008 at 8:31 am

    -Nah, it is the people who form part and identify with a culture. People are smart, cultures pragmatic, they know what is right for them. You cannot control that. It was tried during that period when you grew up in Finland. Restrictions on different nationalities were commonplace. That, in my opinion, was unnatural. Just go to a market place and tell everyone there what they should buy and how they spend their money. It won’t work.

    So why you try to push your culture to us? If your culture and ways had any benefit to offer, we would have adopted it already. We have not, so it holds no value to us.

    So how about you learning how to live in Finland according to Finnish culture, because it is right for you, and stop bitching how we refuse to copy your failure of a culture to replace ours.

    You are one coming here, to OUR country and telling that we should stop living like we prefer and instead emulate your failured system.

    -Then this proves that other cultures can also live in this country harmoniously.

    Are you that stupid? Other cultures can live in this country only if they accept framework of FINNISH CULTURE. Go on and try to find Swedish minority or Sami minority having any notable cultural traditions which are in conflict with Finnish.

    There aren’t any, because due to problems caused by such conflicts would have destroyed those cultures. So, instead of trying to force their culture upon Finns, they accepted that they have to adjust their culture.

    That is what I expect from immigrants as well. You take Finnish culture and remove all parts of your native culture which are in conflict with Finnish culture. Result, harmony. If you demand that your cultural rules must be respected as if this was your native land, you just beg for conflict.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 22, 2008 at 11:10 am

      –So why you try to push your culture to us? If your culture and ways had any benefit to offer, we would have adopted it already. We have not, so it holds no value to us.

      Nobody is pushing anything on you. We live in a democratic society which means we have choices. That is our right. Then there is the law and what is considered illegal. Read the Equality Act.

      What are the cultural rules that come into conflict? Is it McDonalds versus 1960s grilli kioski version of the hamburger with a fried egg? Is this what you call cultural invasion? What do you mean? What do you consider SO threatening? Is it competition for work and social benefits? What?

      Reply
    2. Enrique says:
      December 22, 2008 at 11:41 am

      –So how about you learning how to live in Finland according to Finnish culture, because it is right for you, and stop bitching how we refuse to copy your failure of a culture to replace ours. You are one coming here, to OUR country and telling that we should stop living like we prefer and instead emulate your failured system.

      This shows your low-esteem for others. I am not coming to YOUR country — I am living in OUR country. I guess you still do not get it. A healthy society has diverse opinions. However, if they come from someone who does not fit your narrow view of who is a Finn, right away you get a knee-jerk reaction: adapt to our culture. Can’t you see how ludicrous your arguments are. You sound very much — probably a bit too much — like DeTant.

      Reply
  6. Tiwaz says:
    December 22, 2008 at 12:16 pm

    -This shows your low-esteem for others. I am not coming to YOUR country — I am living in OUR country. I guess you still do not get it. A healthy society has diverse opinions. However, if they come from someone who does not fit your narrow view of who is a Finn, right away you get a knee-jerk reaction: adapt to our culture. Can’t you see how ludicrous your arguments are. You sound very much — probably a bit too much — like DeTant.

    You were not born in this country, you have not been raised in this country. You have no connection with this country. You do not respect the culture of this country.

    How this could be your country if you do not accept things that make it THIS country but instead try to push your own culture and values down the throats of us native?

    Why you do not see that to me it is offensive for you to come to this country, this country where my family has resided for generations, and presume you have some kind of right to start telling me how to live in MY BIRTHPLACE. I do not come to your country of origin to tell how you should switch your society to one resembling Finnish. But then again, I am polite unlike you.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 22, 2008 at 7:21 pm

      –Why you do not see that to me it is offensive for you to come to this country, this country where my family has resided for generations, and presume you have some kind of right to start telling me how to live in MY BIRTHPLACE. I do not come to your country of origin to tell how you should switch your society to one resembling Finnish. But then again, I am polite unlike you.

      Hey, my family has resided for generation in this country as well. This country is a pluralistic democracy. I am surprised that it has not dawned on you that there are different opinions about Finnish society. If I can respect your view of Finnish society but then you must reciprocate. Some people do not see Finland the way you do. Finland, as love, is in the eye of the beholder.

      –I do not come to your country of origin to tell how you should switch your society to one resembling Finnish. But then again, I am polite unlike you.

      Hey, be my guest. It does not bother me one bit because I learned one of the most important lessons from living in a democracy and in a dictatorship: allowing others to air their opinions.

      Reply
  7. Tiwaz says:
    December 22, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    Yes, we live in democratic society. That means we Finns have every right not to want to deal with you foreigners who do not respect our culture.

    If that means you just did not get the job because you are not speaking language or understanding of culture. Tough luck, you CHOSE not to learn how things work in Finland.

    Your choice, your failure.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 22, 2008 at 5:48 pm

      Do you really thing it is that way? Come on! Is this another one of your tease jokes. People make an effort to learn the language and integrate in this society. You speak as if every immigrant that comes to Finland locks himself/herself in a corner and does not want to learn anything about this culture. I think, however, the problem goes much deeper than one person not wanting to integrate.

      Reply
  8. Kulkuri says:
    December 22, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    Interesting, there are similar dialogues going on here in Yhdysvallat. Some of those that have been here for some generations are all for keeping anyone else from coming here and use some of the same arguements I see in the comments section here. While I am proud to be a Finn, I realize that no culture can go it alone. There is a lot of the Finnish culture to be proud of, but a lot of it is really somebody else’s culture. Some time back someone pointed out where most of the traditions of this season come from. Would someone tell me what traditional celebrations were held before the Chuch invaded??

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 22, 2008 at 9:14 pm

      Terve Kulkuri, nice to hear from you. Yes, that is the way it seems to be in Finland. Thank you for your good question, which is highlighted in http://www.lasttrumpetministries.org/tracts/tract3.html
      Like in all cultures, there are good and not-so-good things. Culture takes on a new meaning when we start calling the place where it is practiced “home.” Paljon kiitoksia.

      Reply
  9. intternetnetsi says:
    December 23, 2008 at 2:16 am

    Problem isnt cultures or races, problem is when we are asked to understand and condone those. I cant care less if you are black, purple, white or whatever as long you dont insult my, i am local, culture. I will tell that your culture have fucked up values and thats not racism/nazism/phobia.
    Multiculturalism tells that every culture is equal, well its lie like communism and socialism. See ism on all.

    http://openlibrary.org/details/throughfinlandin00tweeuoft

    Read about woman liberties in there, thats part of my culture. And someone coming from muslim country have either accept that or fuck off.
    We were first in europe to give right to vote for womans and i grow up in enviroment where woman is equal.
    Of course there is still bit that house is called by mans name but all knows who really runs it, culture.

    And about gays/lesbians, in finnish culture what happens in bedroom stays in bedroom and we dont really want to know. I condone homosexuality but since its not my business if someone is i just dont care. One of my friends is gay but since he dont try to hit me im ok with that, thats his business.

    There are some what i want to preserve, womans right as equal and gays right to be what they want to be as equal. everyone as equal. Some cultures hang people like that.

    And multiculturalism isnt for equal, its like 100m run has to have 90m starting points for whites.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 23, 2008 at 10:28 am

      –Read about woman liberties in there, thats part of my culture. And someone coming from muslim country have either accept that or f*** off.
      We were first in europe to give right to vote for womans and i grow up in enviroment where woman is equal.

      Yes, it is a big no-no to discriminate against women in Finland. It is a sure way to get you in a lot of hot water. Women must still fight for equal pay in Finland.
      Did you know, Onkko, that Finland was one of the first counties in the world(?)/Europe to pass the far-reaching Equality Act/Yhteisvertaisuuslaki. Just like with women and other minorities in this country, the job of gaining social rights is a long path. It is a good matter that we have as a nation started to walk on that path.

      Reply
  10. intternetnetsi says:
    December 23, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    -Women must still fight for equal pay in Finland.

    Bullshit. Woman are prone to work in areas like nurses what arent as good paid as construction or like that. For same job they get same pay.

    – Did you know, Onkko, that Finland was one of the first counties in the world(?)/Europe to pass the far-reaching Equality Act/Yhteisvertaisuuslaki.

    Yes i do know and multiculturalism is against that. Multiculturalism is like 100m run where white beefeating straight man starts on 90m line just to be “equal”.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 23, 2008 at 10:45 pm

      I disagree. Here is one out of many studies that show that there is gender discrimination when it comes to salaries.

      Suomessa naisten ja miesten palkkaerot ovat suuremmat kuin EU-maissa keskimäärin. EU:n tasa-arvoraportin mukaan eurooppalaiset naiset tienasivat vuonna 5 prosenttia vähemmän kuin miehet vuonna 2005. Suomessa eroa on kuitenkin lähes 20 prosenttia. Näin ollen naisen euro pysyttelee sitkeästi 80 sentissä.

      Source: http://www.unifem.fi/naiset_ja_tyoelama.php

      Come on, Onkko. You know that it isn’t that way. Finns have a big head start at the start line.

      Reply
  11. intternetnetsi says:
    December 24, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Bullshit again. Womans work like nurses and such and there pay isnt good. Mans work in areas what produce so they have better pay, and same time pay for womans salaries in non producing areas.

    There isnt unequality on salaries just different workplaces, womans dont commonly work e.g. as blumber but instead they work as nurse. Also making childrens affects on salary, it takes time from work experience what directly affects on salary.

    You have to look man and woman in same workplace with same responsibilies and you find that salary is same.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 24, 2008 at 12:37 pm

      Well, then you should write to the people at http://www.unifem.fi/naiset_ja_tyoelama.php and tell them that they got it all wrong. I cannot suggest anything else.

      Reply
  12. DeTant Blomhat says:
    December 24, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    I wouldn’t say that a “monoculture” is what I am looking for. I am looking for an equality based society with “one set of rules” for all. So like if you play football, you cannot take the ball and run with it in your armpit.

    If there comes people who don’t wish to “play ball” according to the rules then thats their problem and not the home teams problem really.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 24, 2008 at 3:03 pm

      If you do not explain the rules and that both sides agree on them as equals, then it makes it very difficult to play by any rules. We have one of the lowest amount of foreigners in the EU per capita and some are placing a whole bunch of obstacles and assuming that everything will be a failure. What is it that you fear?

      Reply
  13. intternetnetsi says:
    December 25, 2008 at 10:52 am

    -and that both sides agree on them as equals,

    There comes problem, i wont ever never agree with muslim values about freedom and rights of e.g. woman. And i refuse to “respect” their values. Do you know there is people dying because of “political correctness” and “respect” of their culture? Thats one i refuse to talk about as equal.

    -We have one of the lowest amount of foreigners in the EU per capita and some are placing a whole bunch of obstacles and assuming that everything will be a failure. What is it that you fear?

    Thank good for that and i fight to keep it like that. And what i fear? i fear riots like in malmo and all around and misuse “political correctness” to bash our culture and immoral demands of minorities. I fear womans dropping from balcony and mutilation of childs. Cultures arent equal.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q17z3UqLeHI there is some racism to you.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 25, 2008 at 11:17 pm

      Why is it Onkko that when you bring up the subject of immigration you normally bring its most darkest side. What about, whenever I speak about Finns, I talk badly about the culture, how people do this and that? That is a distortion and that is exactly what you do when you bring up a certain group of closed minded individuals.

      Do you fear riots in Mälmö or that there will be more competition for jobs and welfare services? Political correctness, as some have referred, goes a bit overboard. However, it is “correct” not to insult groups because of their culture. That has nothing to do with “political correctness” but common sense and how were were brought up in our homes to respect others.

      Reply
  14. DeTant Blomhat says:
    December 25, 2008 at 1:44 pm

    Yes Enrique, but its our field and our ball – and our rules. They’re there up on the table to be read – they’re not open for discussion.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 25, 2008 at 10:58 pm

      Then, DeTant, there is no game, or a game full of question marks, intrigue and inequality.

      Reply
  15. intternetnetsi says:
    December 26, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    -Why is it Onkko that when you bring up the subject of immigration you normally bring its most darkest side.

    Because i want bring balance, you and most of media only talk about how great they are and i bash that back because its a lie. There is unsolved problems what arent talked about and i dont want any troublemaker more in here. And some cultures are troublemakers like it or not.

    -Do you fear riots in Mälmö or that there will be more competition for jobs and welfare services?

    Problem is riots and so called “need of workers”, there is no need for workers only for cheap exploitable workforce what cannot fight back, no modern slavery i say. And no one else than finn dont have any right to felware services.
    And my job.. foreigner without fluent finnish cannot compere with it.

    Reply
  16. DeTant Blomhat says:
    December 27, 2008 at 10:07 am

    I do not respect people who throw their daughters off the balcony for the honor of their family.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 27, 2008 at 1:57 pm

      Neither do I. But I respect people that move to another country and want to improve their lives.

      Reply
  17. intternetnetsi says:
    December 28, 2008 at 6:52 pm

    -But I respect people that move to another country and want to improve their lives.

    I dont if that costs to host country, i call that leeching.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 28, 2008 at 7:04 pm

      -I dont if that costs to host country, i call that leeching.

      How can a person who wants to improve his life by working be a cost to the host country?

      Reply
  18. intternetnetsi says:
    December 28, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    .How can a person who wants to improve his life by working be a cost to the host country?

    By not having proper skills to get a job and bringing his clan with him. They just send “orphan” “child” and then theres suddently 15 relatives coming too. And all are of course willing to work.. Too bad if you skill is herd goat or chew chat and lack ability to read or write even your own language possibilies getting job isnt good.

    And then valid way somehow low paid worker brings few childs and wife, school to childs and wife + healtcare etc.
    I red study, it was from start to middle of 90s so not much work to do, that after 6 years average immigrant was almost free of cost to finland… so no richness..

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 29, 2008 at 7:07 am

      This is ridiculous and demeaning. I guess you still have no clue why people move and migrate to countries. I guess other superpowers such as the US, and bigger economies such as Australia, Canada, Brazil have got it all wrong. Your problem is that you have a very lowly and simplistic view of immigrants. You believe they are a bunch of “goat-herders” who are unskilled. That kind of an attitude will not only bring you a healthy dose of ignorance but is hazardous to this society’s spiritual health.

      Reply
  19. intternetnetsi says:
    December 29, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Thats not right, i have clear knowledge why people immigrate. I have seen people struggling with permission even when they had a job, but they arent enough multicultural. Read news how swedish immigrant wasnt “immigrant” enough to be noted when she got in as “kansanedustaja” but there were texts about no immigrant got thru. Look how polish jude is in goverment and still no “immigrant” in goverment..

    There are two types of immigrants and you probably know witch one is problem and what multiculturalism really means.

    And quess witch immigrant is multicultural.

    According to Vera Izrailit, who is finn (well not officially yet), Ulkomailla syntyneistä Suomen asukkaista 35% ovat syntyneet EU-maissa, 25% entisessä Neuvostoliitossa tai Venäjällä, ja 5% muissa teollisuusmaissa (Usa, Kanada, Norja, Japani, Israel, Australia, jne.).

    She is jude born in USSR fleed to USA and moved to here, she doesnt need multiculturalism. Ryssä mikä ryssä mutta kyllä siitä suomalainen tehtiin 🙂 Look http://izrailit.blogspot.com/

    US, Australia and Canada haves apartheid laws and real segregation of people. Only way they still exists is because most of people are white european origin with european set of mind.
    And again all of those are build by immigrants destroying current inhabitants. Young countries.

    We probably see in next 40 years when some of european countries are majority muslims how things go but what it seems its sad.

    Again youre hopefull and i have facts, i really hope immigration is like you say but it isnt.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 31, 2008 at 7:32 am

      –According to Vera Izrailit, who is finn (well not officially yet), Ulkomailla syntyneistä Suomen asukkaista 35% ovat syntyneet EU-maissa, 25% entisessä Neuvostoliitossa tai Venäjällä, ja 5% muissa teollisuusmaissa (Usa, Kanada, Norja, Japani, Israel, Australia, jne.).

      This is interesting. Does she say from which source she got this information?

      –US, Australia and Canada haves apartheid laws and real segregation of people.

      In order to use the term “apartheid” you really have to know what it means. I would not classify these countries as “practicing” apartheid.

      –We probably see in next 40 years when some of european countries are majority muslims how things go but what it seems its sad.

      I think you are exaggerating.

      Reply
  20. intternetnetsi says:
    December 29, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    I forgot to invite you in new forum http://hommaforum.org/ what is just few weeks old but we need your view also.

    Reply
  21. intternetnetsi says:
    December 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm

    And i also forgot to tell you about http://www.teolinst.fi/j/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92:15-islam-ja-evankeliumi&catid=72:netissae-olevat-iustitiat&Itemid=93

    Thats written by cristian but atleast you cant say he wont know what he is talking about 🙂

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 31, 2008 at 7:33 am

      Thank you for the links.

      Reply
  22. Tiwaz says:
    December 31, 2008 at 8:32 am

    -Neither do I. But I respect people that move to another country and want to improve their lives.

    I do not. Moving from your multicultural hellhole to this stable, prosperous nation does not give you right to ANYTHING. As you are yet to prove yourself as person contributing to this society.

    And if you do not play the ball according to OUR, native and established, rules… You are not contributing anything but problems. Thus, you adapting to our culture is first step of earning respect. Getting your ass to Finland is not.

    -This is ridiculous and demeaning. I guess you still have no clue why people move and migrate to countries. I guess other superpowers such as the US, and bigger economies such as Australia, Canada, Brazil have got it all wrong. Your problem is that you have a very lowly and simplistic view of immigrants. You believe they are a bunch of “goat-herders” who are unskilled. That kind of an attitude will not only bring you a healthy dose of ignorance but is hazardous to this society’s spiritual health.

    Brazil? Superpower? Large economy? BS! Their GDP is below 10 000 USD.
    They have large economy only because their country is huge.

    As for others, they have insane stability and crime issues DUE to failure to integrate everyone to single set of values and principles. Malmö riots, Paris riots, USA race riots, Australia gang rapes, Canada is starting to experience them as well as crime climbs.

    Anywhere where people do not adhere to single set of rules, there is chaos and destruction.

    As for changing the rules or negotiating them with immigrants…

    Why? What makes YOU worthy to tell us NATIVES how to live in our country? If you can’t live in our country by our rules. Fuck off!

    If we start changing the country to fit your ungrateful immigrant ass, we change it to something we are not comfortable to live in. And we want to be able to say that we enjoy living in our native country. Because it is our native country, it is only country in the world where we can call ourselves natives. It is only country with this particular culture.

    If we change it to fit your ungrateful immigrant ass, there is no more Finland.

    We may, and that is may, adopt some influences from your culture. But WE, natives, decide what is worthy to be added. Not you. And we only add it if it fits our existinc culture.

    Latest wave of various christmas fads has lots of foreign influences. But most of those are just that, fads. They come and go. Only ones which fit EXISTING Finnish culture have any hope to be added to Finnish culture.

    Reply
  23. Vera says:
    December 31, 2008 at 9:55 am

    Enrique: “–According to Vera Izrailit, who is finn (well not officially yet), Ulkomailla syntyneistä Suomen asukkaista 35% ovat syntyneet EU-maissa, 25% entisessä Neuvostoliitossa tai Venäjällä, ja 5% muissa teollisuusmaissa (Usa, Kanada, Norja, Japani, Israel, Australia, jne.).

    This is interesting. Does she say from which source she got this information?”

    The source is Tilastokeskus.

    http://pxweb2.stat.fi/database/StatFin/vrm/vaerak/vaerak_fi.asp and from there the table “Syntymävaltio iän ja sukupuolen mukaan maakunnittain 1990 – 2007”

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      December 31, 2008 at 1:12 pm

      Hi Vera, congratulations on your neat blog. Many have spoken of it in Migrant Tales. Thank you for sending the link.
      Happy New Year!

      Reply
  24. intternetnetsi says:
    December 31, 2008 at 7:13 pm

    -In order to use the term “apartheid” you really have to know what it means. I would not classify these countries as “practicing” apartheid.

    Apartheid is racial/cultural segregation and that happens there and bit in finland too.

    Kas Veera meiä oma ryssä tuli tänne 🙂
    Tervetuloa 🙂

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more about documentary film
Read more

Recent Posts

  • Mahad Sheikh Musse:* Kohti yhdenvertaista Suomea
  • A promising result about the Perussuomalaiset
  • Reijä Härkönen: Kokoomuksen valtuustoryhmässä Helsingissä on rasisteja
  • It’s the elephant in the room, stupid!
  • The cyanide capsule of the authoritarian ruler

Recent Comments

  1. Ahti Tolvanen on Europe is toothless and lost
  2. Ahti Tolvanen on Helsinki Noir: A play reflecting troubled times
  3. JTM on If you went back 200 generations, how many grandparents would you have?
  4. Angel Barrientos on Angel Barrientos is one of the kind beacons of Finland’s Chilean community
  5. Jorge Serendero on Angel Barrientos is one of the kind beacons of Finland’s Chilean community

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007

Categories

  • ?? Gia L?c
  • ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????
  • ???????
  • @HerraAhmed
  • @mondepasrond
  • @nohatefinland
  • @oula_silver
  • @Varathas
  • A Pakistani family
  • äärioikeisto
  • Abbas Bahmanpour
  • Abdi Muhis
  • Abdirahim Hussein Mohamed
  • Abdirahim Husu Hussein
  • Abdirisak Mahamed
  • About Migrant Tales
  • activism
  • Adam Al-Sawad
  • Adel Abidin
  • Afrofinland
  • Ahmed IJ
  • Ahti Tolvanen
  • Aino Pennanen
  • Aisha Maniar
  • Alan Ali
  • Alan Anstead
  • Alejandro Díaz Ortiz
  • Alekey Bulavsev
  • Aleksander Hemon
  • Aleksanterinliitto
  • Aleksanterinliitto ry
  • Aleksanterinliitto ry:n hallitus
  • Alex Alex
  • Alex Mckie
  • Alexander Nix
  • Alexandra Ayse Albayrak
  • Alexis Neuberg
  • Ali Asaad Hasan Alzuhairi
  • Ali Hossein Mir Ali
  • Ali Rashid
  • Ali Sagal Abdikarim
  • Alina Tsui
  • Aline Müller
  • All categories
  • Aman Heidari
  • Amiirah Salleh-Hoddin & Jana Turk
  • Amin A. Alem
  • Amir Zuhairi
  • Amkelwa Mbekeni
  • Ana María Gutiérrez Sorainen
  • Anachoma
  • Anders Adlecreutz
  • Angeliina Koskinen
  • Anna De Mutiis
  • Anna María Gutiérrez Sorainen
  • Anna-Kaisa Kuusisto ja Jaakko Tuominen
  • Annastiina Kallius
  • Anneli Juise Friman Lindeman
  • Announcement
  • Anonymous
  • Antero Leitzinger
  • anti-black racism
  • Anti-Hate Crime Organisation Finland
  • Anudari Boldbaatar
  • Aspergers Syndrome
  • Asylum Corner
  • Asylum seeker 406
  • Athena Griffin and Joe Feagin
  • Autism
  • Avaaz.org
  • Awale Olad
  • Ayan Said Mohamed
  • AYY
  • Barachiel
  • Bashy Quraishy
  • Beatrice Kabutakapua
  • Beri Jamal
  • Beri Jamal and Enrique Tessieri
  • Bertolt Brecht
  • Boiata
  • Boodi Kabbani
  • Bruno Gronow
  • Camtu Suhonen
  • Carmen Pekkarinen
  • Çelen Oben and Sheila Riikonen
  • Chiara Costa-Virtanen
  • Chiara Costa-Virtanen
  • Chiara Sorbello
  • Christian Thibault
  • Christopher Wylie
  • Clara Dublanc
  • Dana
  • Daniel Malpica
  • Danilo Canguçu
  • David Papineau
  • David Schneider
  • Dexter He
  • Don Flynn
  • Dr Masoud Kamali
  • Dr. Faith Mkwesha
  • Dr. Theodoros Fouskas
  • Edna Chun
  • Eeva Kilpi
  • Emanuela Susheela
  • En castellano
  • ENAR
  • Enrique
  • Enrique Tessieri
  • Enrique Tessieri & Raghad Mchawh
  • Enrique Tessieri & Yahya Rouissi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Muhammed Shire
  • Enrique Tessieri and Sira Moksi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Tom Vandenbosch
  • Enrique Tessieri and Wael Che
  • Enrique Tessieri and Yahya Rouissi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Zimema Mhone
  • Epäluottamusmies
  • EU
  • Europe
  • European Islamophobia Report
  • European Islamophobia Report 2019,
  • European Union
  • Eve Kyntäjä
  • Facebook
  • Fadumo Dayib
  • Faisa Kahiye
  • Farhad Manjoo
  • Fasismi
  • Finland
  • Fizza Qureshi
  • Flyktingar och asyl
  • Foreign Student
  • Fozia Mir-Ali
  • Frances Webber
  • Frida Selim
  • Gareth Rice
  • Ghyslain Vedeaux
  • Global Art Point
  • Great Replacement
  • Habiba Ali
  • Hami Bahadori
  • Hami Bahdori
  • Hamid
  • Hamid Alsaameere
  • Hamid Bahdori
  • Handshake
  • Harmit Athwal
  • Hassan Abdi Ali
  • Hassan Muhumud
  • Heikki Huttunen
  • Heikki Wilenius
  • Helsingin Sanomat
  • Henning van der Hoeven
  • Henrika Mälmsröm
  • Hser Hser
  • Hser Hser ja Mustafa Isman
  • Husein Muhammed
  • Hussain Kazemian
  • Hussain Kazmenian
  • Ibrahim Khan
  • Ida
  • Ignacio Pérez Pérez
  • Iise Ali Hassan
  • Ilari Kaila & Tuomas Kaila
  • Imam Ka
  • inside-an-airport
  • Institute of Race Relations
  • Iraqi asylum seeker
  • IRR European News Team
  • IRR News Team
  • Islamic Society of Norhern FInland
  • Islamic Society of Northern Finland
  • Islamophobia
  • Jacobinmag.com
  • Jallow Momodou
  • Jan Holmberg
  • Jane Elliott
  • Jani Mäkelä
  • Jari Luoto
  • Jegor Nazarov
  • Jenni Stammeier
  • Jenny Bourne
  • Jessie Daniels
  • Joe Davidow
  • Johannes Koski
  • John D. Foster
  • John Grayson
  • John Marriott
  • Jon Burnett
  • Jorma Härkönen
  • Jos Schuurmans
  • José León Toro Mejías
  • Josue Tumayine
  • Jouni Karnasaari
  • Juan Camilo
  • Jukka Eräkare
  • Julian Abagond
  • Julie Pascoet
  • Jussi Halla-aho
  • Jussi Hallla-aho
  • Jussi Jalonen
  • JusticeDemon
  • Kadar Gelle
  • Kaksoiskansalaisuus
  • Kansainvälinen Mikkeli
  • Kansainvälinen Mikkeli ry
  • Katherine Tonkiss
  • Kati Lepistö
  • Kati van der Hoeven-Lepistö
  • Katie Bell
  • Kättely
  • Kerstin Ögård
  • Keshia Fredua-Mensah & Jamie Schearer
  • Khadidiatou Sylla
  • Khadra Abdirazak Sugulle
  • Kiihotus kansanryhmää vastaan
  • Kirsi Crowley
  • Koko Hubara
  • Kristiina Toivikko
  • Kubra Amini
  • KuRI
  • La Colectiva
  • La incitación al odio
  • Laura Huhtasaari
  • Lauri Finér
  • Leif Hagert
  • Léo Custódio
  • Leo Honka
  • Leontios Christodoulou
  • Lessie Branch
  • Lex Gaudius
  • Leyes de Finlandia
  • Liikkukaa!
  • Linda Hyökki
  • Liz Fekete
  • M. Blanc
  • Maarit Snellman
  • Mahad Sheikh Musse
  • Maija Vilkkumaa
  • Malmin Kebab Pizzeria Port Arthur
  • Marcell Lorincz
  • Mari Aaltola
  • María Paz López
  • Maria Rittis Ikola
  • Maria Tjader
  • Marja-Liisa Tolvanen
  • Mark
  • Markku Heikkinen
  • Marshall Niles
  • Martin Al-Laji
  • Maryan Siyad
  • Matt Carr
  • Mauricio Farah Gebara
  • Media Monitoring Group of Finland
  • Micah J. Christian
  • Michael McEachrane
  • Michele Levoy
  • Michelle Kaila
  • Migrant Tales
  • Migrant Tales Literary
  • Migrantes News
  • Migrants' Rights Network
  • MigriLeaks
  • Mikko Kapanen
  • Miriam Attias and Camila Haavisto
  • Mohamed Adan
  • Mohammad Javid
  • Mohammad M.
  • Monikulttuurisuus
  • Monisha Bhatia and Victoria Canning
  • Mor Ndiaye
  • Muh'ed
  • Muhamed Abdimajed Murshid
  • Muhammed Shire
  • Muhammed Shire and Enrique Tessieri
  • Muhis Azizi
  • Musimenta Dansila
  • Muslimiviha
  • Musulmanes
  • Namir al-Azzawi
  • Natsismi
  • Neurodiversity
  • New Women Connectors
  • Nils Muižnieks
  • No Labels No Walls
  • Noel Dandes
  • Nuor Dawood
  • Omar Khan
  • Otavanmedia
  • Oula Silvennoinen
  • Paco Diop
  • Pakistani family
  • Pentti Stranius
  • Perussuomalaiset
  • perustuslaki
  • Petra Laiti
  • Petri Cederlöf
  • Pia Grochowski
  • Podcast-lukija Bea Bergholm
  • Pohjois – Suomen Islamilainen Yhdyskunta
  • Pohjois Suomen Islamilainen Yhyskunta
  • Polina Kopylova
  • Race Files
  • racism
  • Racism Review
  • Raghad Mchawh
  • Ranska
  • Rashid H. and Migrant Tales
  • Rasismi
  • Raul Perez
  • Rebecka Holm
  • Reem Abu-Hayyeh
  • Refugees
  • Reija Härkönen
  • Remiel
  • Reza Nasri
  • Richard Gresswell
  • Riikka Purra
  • Risto Laakkonen
  • Rita Chahda
  • Ritva Kondi
  • Robito Ibrahim
  • Roble Bashir
  • Rockhaya Sylla
  • Rodolfo Walsh
  • Roger Casale
  • Rostam Atai
  • Roxana Crisólogo Correa
  • Ruth Grove-White
  • Ruth Waweru-Folabit
  • S-worldview
  • Sadio Ali Nuur
  • Sandhu Bhamra
  • Sara de Jong
  • Sarah Crowther
  • Sari Alhariri
  • Sarkawt Khalil
  • Sasu
  • Scot Nakagawa
  • Shabana Ahmadzai
  • Shada Islam
  • Sharon Chang blogs
  • Shenita Ann McLean
  • Shirlene Green Newball
  • Sini Savolainen
  • Sira Moksi
  • Sonia K.
  • Sonia Maria Koo
  • Steverp
  • Stop Deportations
  • Suldaan Said Ahmed
  • Suomen mediaseurantakollektiivi
  • Suomen Muslimifoorumi ry
  • Suomen viharikosvastainen yhdistys
  • Suomen viharikosvastainen yhdistys ry
  • Suomi
  • Supermen
  • Susannah
  • Suva
  • Syrjintä
  • Talous
  • Tapio Tuomala
  • Taw Reh
  • Teivo Teivainen
  • The Daily Show
  • The Heino
  • The Supermen
  • Thomas Elfgren
  • Thulfiqar Abdulkarim
  • Tim McGettigan
  • Tino Singh
  • Tito Moustafa Sliem
  • Tobias Hübinette and L. Janelle Dance
  • Transport
  • Trica Danielle Keaton
  • Trilce Garcia
  • Trish Pääkkönen
  • Trish Pääkkönen and Enrique Tessieri
  • Tuulia Reponen
  • Uncategorized
  • UNITED
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Uyi Osazee
  • Väkivalta
  • Venla-Sofia Saariaho
  • Vieraskynä
  • W. Che
  • W. Che an Enrique Tessieri
  • Wael Ch.
  • Wan Wei
  • Women for Refugee Women
  • Xaan Kaafi Maxamed Xalane
  • Xassan Kaafi Maxamed Xalane
  • Xassan-Kaafi Mohamed Halane & Enrique Tessieri
  • Yahya Rouissi
  • Yasmin Yusuf
  • Yassen Ghaleb
  • Yle Puhe
  • Yve Shepherd
  • Zahra Khavari
  • Zaker
  • Zamzam Ahmed Ali
  • Zeinab Amini ja Soheila Khavari
  • Zimema Mahone and Enrique Tessieri
  • Zimema Mhone
  • Zoila Forss Crespo Moreyra
  • ZT
  • Zulma Sierra
  • Zuzeeko Tegha Abeng
© 2025 Migrant tales | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme