Using Finnish “fatherland” patriotism to justify neo-Nazism

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

The Ulla Pyysalo case has turned some Perussuomalaiset (PS) party faces red. Her name came up on a membership list of a neo-Nazi organization Suomen Kansallinen Vastarinta (SKV) after hackers broke into the www.patriootti.com website over the weekend. 

When reading Pyysalo’s explanation on Uusi Suomi for being on the SKV membership list, it’s difficult to say what is more shocking: her membership in the neo-Nazi association or lame excuses.

Attempting to brush her SVL membership conveniently under the rug, Pyysalo asks on Uusi Suomi why she and PS MP Jussi Halla-aho are being punished but nothing ever happens to PS MP Teuvo Hakkarainen?

Her membership in SVL will be brought up at a PS board meeting on November 19, according to Nelonen TV.

Her boss, PS MP Juho Eerola’s explanation are just as ludicrous as his aide’s. He told the media that the case has no bearing since Pyysalo became a SVL member two years ago, when she was a Center Party member.

Eerola’s support for Pyysalo is understandable since he belongs to the far-right Suomen Sisu association. The MP from Kotka once wrote how he admired Benito Mussolini’s eonomic system because there was no unemployment.

Pyysalo is no stranger to the racist and homophobic world, when she published a “joke” in July on Facebook about Green MP Jani Toivola, who is black and gay.

Other politicians that have popped up on the SKV list are Tuomas Okkonen, a PS local politician from Oulu, and Nino Nevalainen, a Left Alliance (independent) councilman from the Häme region.

I am certain that sensible Finns are just as outraged as I am about how a far-right group within a right-wing populist party sits in our parliament.

There is nothing “patriotic” about racism and hating different minorities never mind glorifying Nazi Germany. Some 40 million people died in World War 2 due to Nazism.

It’ll be interesting to see how the PS handles the Pyysalo case. Will it slap her hand for being a member of SVL or show her the door?

The PS will never be a credible party as long as it houses extremists of the worst order.

People like Pyysalo have not only hijacked the term “patriotism” but have given it a bad name.

Hackers get far-right Kansallinen Vastarinta membership-request list

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Enrique Tessieri

The growing face of far-right Finland exposed itself Monday when some hackers succeeded at breaking into  www.patriootti.com’s  membership-request list. One of the red faces to appear was Tuomas Okkonen, a Perussuomalaiset (PS) party board vice president in Oulu.

Okkonen states on Facebook that he was “drunk” when he sought membership in the neo-Nazi association.

While the PS’ favorite excuses for their gaffes has been misinterpreted “satire” or “humor,”  Okkonen has taken such excuses to a new level: “I was drunk.”

Okkonen got caught lying: He said on his Facebook he sent his membership application a year ago when if fact it happened in summer.

UPDATE: Ulla Pyysalo, far-right PS MP Juho Eerola’s aide, was on the Suomen vastarintaliike (SVL) membership list as well, according to Ilta-Sanomat. Pyysalo apologized in July after making a racist and homophobic joke about Green MP Jani Toivola.

Eerola, who is vice president of the PS, how shown his far-right colors on a number of occasions. The Suomen Sisu association member has praised Benito Mussolini’s economic model because there was no unemployment.

This is what Okkonen wrote to the far-right association, SVL: “I am a city council member of the Perussuomalaiset party and I understand your ideology. You have my support!!!…After you hear what we (Perussuomalaiset?) have planned, (you’ll see that) we are both fighting for the same thing…I sent you my contact information. Please do not distribute it if you are fighting for the fatherland.”

Even though SKV is seen by some as a marginal extremist group, far-right extremism should never be underestimated.

Ossi Mäntylahti writes an interesting blog about the list that hackers got from www.patriootti.com. He reveals (in Finnish) the messages that these would-be members sent to SVL.

SKV is like many neo-Nazi ogranizations in Europe, who live in a delusional world about racial purity that date back to Germany and Europe of the 1930s.

Labor discrimination is openly advertised in Finland

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

I visited Tampere over the weekend and visited a popular beer tavern called Ravintola Plevna. One of the first matters that caught my eye was a sign on the upper-left-hand side of the entrance that read: “Finnish work.”* If you visit Plevna’s  website you will, however, find links of the establishment in English, German and Russian. 

The sign on the door, Suomalainen työ, is misleading for a number of reasons. First, it’s unclear if they are speaking of Finnish employees and/or products.

If we look at the Avainlippu logo means that a product has been produced in Finland.  But what does this imply?

While Plevena does not openly advertised that it hires only Finns, placing such a sign on the wall sends a mixed signal especially during this tougher times for immigrants and minorities in Finland.

Unemployment is an issue that affects all of us irrespective of our background. It is like a bomb that does not ask you where you are from before it tears you to shreds.

Finns and Finnish unions should understand that immigrants are in the same, or worse boat, than Finnish workers. Usually immigrants are the last one’s hired and the first one to get laid off from their jobs.

Migrant Tales would be very happy to publish pictures of signs sent by bloggers on establishments that have a policy of hiring only Finns.

*Suomalainen työ.

New York Times: A Son Returns to the Agony of Somalia

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: This opinion piece on the New York Times is dedicated to those politicians in Finland and Europe who believe that Somalian asylum seekers are so-called “welfare shoppers.” Apart from a long list of Perussuomalaiset (PS) party members, Social Democrat MP Kari Rajamäki could learn a thing or two by reading the opinion piece by the Somalian musician and politician. 

“At 12 years old, I lost three of the boys I grew up with in one burst of machine-gun fire — one pull from the misinformed finger of a boy probably not much older than we were,” he writes. “But I was also unusually lucky. The bullets hit everyone but me.”

K’naan was one of the lucky ones to leave Somalia two decades ago. He returned back to his former country and wrote about some impressions it gave him. He was returning to where he was once from: “For miles along that coast, all you see are paint-like blue water, beautiful sand dunes eroding, and an abandoned effort to cap them with concrete. Everything about Somalia feels like abandonment. The buildings, the peace initiatives, the hopes and dreams of greatness for a nation.”

And continues: ” The final and most devastating stop for me was Banadir Hospital, where I was born. The doctors are like hostages of hopelessness, surrounded and outnumbered. Mothers hum lullabies holding the skeletal heads of their children. It seems eyes are the only ornament left of their beautiful faces; eyes like lanterns holding out a glimmer of faint hope. Volunteers are doing jobs they aren’t qualified for. The wards are over-crowded, mixing gun wound, malnutrition and cholera patients. “

If the scenes in Somalia are harrowing, equally disturbing is the indifference in Europe to the suffering in that country and to those that flee the horror.

Thank you Ronni for the heads up!

 

___________

By K’naan

One has to be careful about stories. Especially true ones. When a story is told the first time, it can find a place in the listener’s heart. If the same story is told over and over, it becomes less like a presence in that chest and more like an X-ray of it.

Read whole story.

Itä-Savo: Tilastot eivät kerro todellisuutta rasismista

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Last year’s drop in hate crimes by 15% versus 2009 published by the Police College of Finland raises a lot of questions. How many immigrants take these figures seriously in light of the ever-worsening atmosphere for immigrants and minorities especially after the election in April? In many respects the fall in hate crimes compared with the present situation takes credibility away from the Police College of Finland’s figures.

If hate crimes appear to have risen in Finland, why do we have to wait a whole year to know what happened in such a watershed year like 2011?

While the police has taken a more proactive stance against racism, there is still a lot of work to be done. One issue that the police has not answered is why some immigrants prefer not to report a hate crime or when they are a victim of racist harassment in public?

A story on MTV3 shows that the rights of immigrants when they are victims of a crime is worse than of Finns.

The 15% figure reveals much more than what meets the eye.

____________

Viime viikolla julkaistun tutkimuksen mukaan viharikosten määrä olisi laskenut maassamme 15 prosenttia viime vuonna. Laskua voisi pitää huomattavana ja jopa ilahduttavana kehityksenä, jos siihen voisi uskoa aukottomasti.

Read whole story.

If Finland is serious about stamping out racism…

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

If our society is a model of social justice for other countries to emulate, why would we tolerate discrimination and all types of racism? Which group are the biggest threat to our society: immigrants or anti-immigration groups?

Contrary to the far-right wing of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party led by Jussi Halla-aho and his cronies, which claim that “multiculturalism” (a policy that permits Muslims and Africans from moving to this country) is one of the greatest threats to our society, I would claim that these types of groups pose the greatest threat to Finland.

Despite the spectacular rise of those that want to keep this country “white,” there are encouraging signs that we will not tolerate a society of hostile “us” against “enemy them.”

Even so, there are still out there too many groups, like the PS and others, who aim to create a society where immigrants do not have the same civil rights as the Finns.

It’s exactly these groups, and how they want to change our society, that is scary and what we should adamantly oppose.

Their picture of Finland is the following: Immigrants and minorities would be constantly under suspicion. Using the argument of “free speech,” these groups could say anything they wish and continue spreading outrageous urban myths. These myths would reinforce racism, prejudice and suspicion.

One will find these questionable views of Finnish society in the PS’ Nuiva manifesto.

The message coming from us should be clear: Finland is an open society for those who come here in good faith.  It is a successful and forward-looking society with a strong sense of social justice. These values are important if we want to stamp out racism, one of the biggest threats to Finland today.

Who we are as a nation must be always based on mutual acceptance, respect and equal opportunities for all.

Finland sees a 15% fall in hate crimes in 2010

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

There were a total of 860 hate crimes reported in 2010, which is a 15% fall from 1,007 cases in the previous year, according to the Police College of Finland.

Ministry of interior official Ritva Viljanen says that the report sends a mixed signal. “It is a good matter that the total amount of hate crimes has fallen,” she said. “What is of concern is that the number of hate crimes has grown during a longer period.”

The police have registered hate crimes for the past ten years.

As we know, reporting a hate crime by an immigrant may be difficult for a number of reasons, according to a Migrant Blog entry Thursday.

What would the 2011 figures show taking into account the election victory of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party and the ever-worsening atmosphere in Finland for immigrants and minorities?

We’ll find out next year.

What to do if you are harassed in public in Finland?

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Migrant Tales wrote back in May about how policemen in Pieksämäki and Mikkeli recommended against reporting racist harassment incidents in public to the authorities. The Ombudsman for Minorities was in the dark as well about what to do but called the next day and said that harassment cases should be reported to the police. 

An African was shoved and hit on the back by a young Finnish man on a bus in Jyväskylä. Nobody reacted, not even the drive. The African walked away from the incident evidently shaken by what happened.

What should one do if somebody begins to harass you in public because of your ethnic background, shoves and hits you?

A policeman from Mikkeli, who came to speak to a group of students from different countries, said that racist harassment in public should not be reported to the authorities.

Another policeman from Pieksämäki gave the same advice to Migrant Tales: ”I have been on the force for 35 years and my advice is to walk away. It’s not worth (reporting the crime)  because we’ll never catch the person. My advice? Just walk away.”

Even though I agree that the safety of the victim is the first priority, it is a different matter whether not the incident should be reported to the police.  If you do, at least it will show in police statistics revealing a wider problem that isn’t addressed enough by the authorities and community.

The response by the policemen is a disappointment and shows that they aren’t apparently too concerned by this type of harassment. The silence of the authorities on this front could shed light on a wider problem concerning police relations and immigrants.

Reporting harassment cases to the police can turn into a challenge for the victim. If you do it by phone, get ready to be put on hold indefinitely in some cases. Add to this the lack of communication skills, cultural differences and mistrust of the police, and we see how difficult it may be for an immigrant to report such cases.

Visiting the police station may be a faster and more effective way of reporting such a crime.

One problem with reporting harassment and hate crimes in Finland is the lack of clear standard procedures that are readily understood by all immigrants. In the harassment cases it isn’t  clear and their are conflicting opinions on what one should do.

Contrary to the policemen’s advice from Pieksämäki and Mikkeli, however, the Ombudsman for Minorities recommended: ”It (harassment) should be reported to the police because they may catch the suspect one day (because the person may be caught and identified).”

What should a person do if the policeman says not to bother but the Ombudsman’s office says you should?

Here lies the problem: What to do and whom to believe.

Turun Sanomat: Osa turvapaikanhakijoista maksaa salakuljetuksensa sosiaalituella

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Citing an undisclosed study by officials, Turun Sanomat claims some refugees use social welfare subsidy to pay back people that brought them to Finland under shady conditions. While we know the cost to be 10,000 euros per person, according to the Turku-based daily, nowhere are we told if this is a widespread problem never mind the source(s) of the study. 

Certainly it is a serious problem if one has to pay someone to leave a war-zone. If I were living in such a country, I’d do everything possible to leave and relocate elsewhere, even pay money, than live in a  place where my family could be put in harm’s way. 

Apart from showing the ordeal and suffering that some asylum seekers and refugees face in Europe, what does the Turun Sanomat article want to convey? In light of the present negative atmosphere in Finland, such a story does not invite constructive debate on an issue but reinforces instead the notion that asylum seekers are dishonest or “welfare shoppers”  

Do you agree?

____________

Osa Suomeen salakuljetetuista turvapaikanhakijoista maksaa matkansa sosiaalituellaan. Viranomaisilla on runsaasti viitteitä salakuljetuksen ostamisesta velaksi. –?Tutkimuksissa on selvinnyt, että rahamaksuja välitetään lähtömaihin. Heti kun turvapaikanhakija saa toimeentulotukea, hän lähettää säännöllisesti rahaa Western Unionin tai Forexin kautta kotimaahansa, Länsi-Suomen merivartioston rikostorjuntayksikön tutkinnanjohtaja Matti Hägerström kertoo.

Read whole story.

Separating urban myths from facts in the Finnish immigration debate (Part 2)

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Staying on the topic of urban myths, other ones that we could mention are: immigrants do not want to integrate, immigrants live off social welfare and are lazy. Politicians such as Angela Merkel and David Cameron reinforce these types of urban myths by pinning their countries’ integration policy failures unfairly on immigrants. 

Any serious student of society knows that humans are social animals. Since we survive in groups, our main aim is to adapt. Some of us learn this skill better and faster than others.

Believing a stereotype like “immigrants live off welfare” is illogical. Why would people travel thousands of kilometers to live off social welfare?

Immigrants are ambitious people. Some are so determined to seek out opportunity and a better life that they are willing to sacrifice everything to start life anew in a new country.

If adaption is an important skill learned and reinforced during our childhood and formative years, what logic is there in not adapting to a new society?

In order for any integration program to be successful in Finland or elsewhere, it must have a clear vision of the role that newcomers and their children in the society. Is the host society hostile or receptive to them? Are newcomers and their children doomed to be eternal outsiders? Does society envisage a place for them?

In the same way that society creates pathways to integration for its own people, how well do they work for other groups? Are immigrants or the host society to blame, or both?

If we want to start on the right foot in Finland concerning our ambitious integration program, the first and foremost matter we should do is truly embrace cultural diversity as an important value.

Compared with the last century, Finland has made important progress on this front but a lot of work must be still done to weed out the ignorance and urban myths out there.

If we could get politicians to address proactively an issue relating to immigrants rather than pin the blame and failures “of multiculturalism,” we’d do our society a service rather than cause it harm.

The following words should always ring out when building our society in the new century: mutual acceptance, respect and equal opportunities.