On Wednesday’s A-studio talk show, viewers got once again a taste of the depths of fascism and racism of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) through MP Joakim Vigelius. One of the matters that surprised me was how the host, Petri Raivio, did not stop to fact-check Vigelius’ brazen lies.
Since the Finnish media rarely fact-checks or takes a clear stand in its editorials on migration policy issues, spreading lies and half-truths by xenophobes is fairly easy.
Apart from being a charlatan, Vigelius insulted on the show Social Democrat Vice President Nasima Razmyar with his racist remarks. The PS MP maintained that people from the Middle East and Africa should not come as quota refugees to Finland next year because they “don’t integrate” and are “a threat to society.”
He argued, in front of a woman who was born in Afghanistan that people like her are mostly unemployed, cannot live off their means, have problems following laws, and are prone to commit crimes even if she is a living example of the opposite of his lies.
Another incredible matter that came to light on the talk show was his exaggeration and racism about Europe’s migration problem. Imagine, Vigrlius is worried about such a problem even if Finland had last year 5,372 asylum seekers, according to Statistics Finland.
The asylum seekers coming to Europe are only a drop in the bucket of all those in the world fleeing strife.
Migrant Tales insight:Without Aleksanterinliitto ry, the opinions of Finland’s Russian-speaking community would not be heard loud enough. According to Alexey Bulvatsev, the closing of the border has hurt families in Finland and Russia and made travel to Russia more difficult. And adds: “According to the petitioner, Finland is likely to be in breach of EU law, firstly because Finland’s entry and transit ban on all Russian citizens entering the EU for tourist purposes is in breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1806. Secondly, in view of the petitioner, the closure of the Finnish-Russian border following cases of asylum seekers from third countries crossing the border infringes Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC.”
The petition asks the EU to halt Finland’s illegal policy at the Finnish-Russian border.
Alexey Bulavtsev of Alexsanterinliito ry, an association that supports and protects the rights and freedoms of Russian-speaking Finns, has submitted a petition to the European Parliament to protest the closing of the Finnish-Russian border.
The petitioner refers to the decision of the Finnish government to completely close the Finnish-Russian border in response to the hybrid attack of the Russian Federation on Finland. Bulavtsev alleges that the public has not been informed of any facts that could link the problem of higher than usual number of asylum seekers at the Finnish border to Russia’s presumed hybrid attack on Finland. According to the petitioner, this decision had a negative impact on Finnish families with family ties to the Russian Federation, as it had become difficult for legitimate residents of Finland to travel to Russia. The petitioner alleges that the closure of the land border by the Finnish authorities has a negative impact on the conditions of the inhabitants of the Finnish regions bordering Russia and would damage the economy in eastern Finland. He states that even the postal service between Finland and Russia has been discontinued, which is why the right of Finnish residents to family life guaranteed by Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is limited. According to the petitioner, Finland is likely to be in breach of EU law, firstly because Finland’s entry and transit ban on all Russian citizens entering the EU for tourist purposes is in breach of Article 6, paragraph 1 (e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Regulation (EU) 2018/1806. Secondly, in view of the petitioner, the closure of the Finnish-Russian border following cases of asylum seekers from third countries crossing the border infringes Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 and Article 27 of Directive 2004/38/EC. The petitioner asks the European Commission to issue a regulation to the Finnish government to correct the allegedly illegal acts.
With poll ratings heading south and the municipal election approaching in April, parties like the Perussuomalaiset (PS)* are turning (as usual) to racism and bigotry. They do this because they are fascists to the core.
The media in Finland is part of the country’s racism problem. Since it is white, it would care less for the well-being of migrants and minorities. How many editorials have Finland’s largest daily, Helsingin Sanomat, written about the PS’ and the government’s draconian migration policy?
Zero.
All of this tightening and making life harder for migrants and minorities living in Finland is ok if you explain your flimsy reason: security.
Despite the reasoning, the PS and the government offer no proof that migrants are a threat. Here is a question to the government: Why is Finland’s migration policy so hostile to migrants?
Remember Finland’s day of infamy in July when it passed the pushback law? Well, there has been no rush of migrants to the border. The only fact is that the border continues to be closed, and businesses in cities like Lappeenranta suffer economic hardships.
On the left, Minister of Transport and Communication/Interior Minister Lulu Ranne is smiling because she is announcing how Finland will tighten its migration policy and enforce harsher sentences against migrants. On the right, is a picture that unmasks Ranne as a bully and racist. She is saying to migrants enter Finland at your peril. Sources: Suomen Uutiset and Haleingin Sanomat.
The government continues to shamelessly expose its racist policies. The latest of these is a Helsingin Sanomat scoop that claims the PS wants to exclude Muslims from the quota-refugee scheme in 2025.
The plan, promoted by Ranne and Mari Rantanen, on leave as interior minister until the end of the year, should not surprise us since it is another example of Finland’s zero asylum seeker policy.
Maahanmuuttajataustaisten ja monikielisten nuorten kotoutuminen on usein esillä yhteiskunnallisessa keskustelussa, ja kieli mainitaan toistuvasti suurimpana haasteena. Pitkän urani aikana nuorisotyön ammattilaisena olen kuitenkin nähnyt, että kieli ei suinkaan ole se merkittävin este, jonka nämä nuoret kohtaavat. Haasteet ovat syvemmällä – ne liittyvät asenteisiin, rakenteelliseen syrjintään ja maahanmuuttovastaisuuteen, jotka vaikuttavat monien nuorten elämään.
Kieli on vain osa tarinaa. Monet ajattelevat, että maahanmuuttajataustaisten nuorten haasteet johtuvat siitä, etteivät he osaa riittävän hyvin suomea. On totta, että vastikään Suomeen muuttaneilla nuorilla kielitaito voi olla esteenä esimerkiksi opiskelussa tai työelämään pääsyssä. Kuitenkin suurin osa täällä syntyneistä ja pitkään asuneista nuorista puhuu suomea sujuvasti, ja silti he kohtaavat syrjintää ja ulkopuolisuuden tunnetta. Miksi?
Kieli ei selitä sitä, miksi täällä syntyneet ja kasvaneet nuoret kokevat, etteivät he kuulu tähän yhteiskuntaan. Kielitaito ei suojaa heitä rakenteelliselta rasismilta, ennakkoluuloilta ja syrjinnältä, joita he joutuvat kohtaamaan arjessaan.
Kouluissa ja nuorisotiloissa näemme yhä uudelleen, miten nuoret, jotka ovat syntyneet ja kasvaneet Suomessa, joutuvat taistelemaan saadakseen samanlaisen kohtelun kuin kantasuomalaiset ikätoverinsa.
Muukalaispelko ja maahanmuuttovastaisuus – todelliset haasteet
Yksi suurimmista ongelmista, joita maahanmuuttajataustaiset nuoret kohtaavat, on muukalaispelko ja maahanmuuttovastaisuus. Tämä ei näy pelkästään katukuvassa, vaan se on myös syvällä yhteiskuntamme rakenteissa.
Kun julkinen keskustelu ruokkii maahanmuuttovastaisia asenteita ja jopa parlamentaarikot voivat esittää rasistisia lausuntoja ilman seuraamuksia, ei ole yllättävää, että nuoret tuntevat itsensä ulkopuolisiksi.
Nuoret seuraavat tarkasti, mitä yhteiskunnassa tapahtuu. He näkevät, miten heidän taustansa vuoksi heidät leimataan ja heihin kohdistetaan ennakkoluuloja. Tämä synnyttää epäluottamusta ja turhautumista.
Yhä useammin maahanmuuttajataustaiset nuoret kokevat, että heitä ei oikeasti haluta osaksi yhteiskuntaa, vaikka he puhuvat kieltä ja pyrkivät sopeutumaan. Kun yhteiskunnallinen ilmapiiri on vihamielinen, on vaikea ylläpitää anti-rasistista työotetta. Viranomaistyössä pyritään tarjoamaan turvallisia ja tasa-arvoisia tiloja kaikille nuorille, mutta kuinka voimme tehdä tämän tehokkaasti, jos yhteiskunta ei tue näitä arvoja?
Jos nuoret näkevät, että rasistinen vihapuhe saa julkisessa tilassa hyväksyntää, heidän on vaikea luottaa siihen, että me aikuiset olemme heidän puolellaan. Rakenteellinen rasismi on tunnustettava On helppo sanoa, että syrjintä johtuu vain kielimuurista tai nuorten sopeutumattomuudesta, mutta tämä on vain osa totuutta.
Todellisuudessa suurin ongelma on rakenteellinen rasismi, jota esiintyy niin työelämässä, koulutuksessa kuin arjen kohtaamisissa. Tämä rasismi ei ole aina avointa, mutta se vaikuttaa siihen, miten nuoret kokevat paikkansa yhteiskunnassa.
Yhteiskuntamme tulisi keskittyä enemmän siihen, miten voimme murtaa nämä rakenteet. Anti-rasismityö ei voi olla vain nuorisotyön ammattilaisten tai koulujen vastuulla – sen täytyy olla koko yhteiskunnan yhteinen tehtävä. Meidän on puututtava asenteisiin, jotka ajavat nuoria marginaaliin, ja vaadittava vastuullisuutta myös niiltä, jotka tekevät päätöksiä yhteiskunnassa.
Nuorilla on oikeus kuulua yhteiskuntaan
Maahanmuuttajataustaisilla ja monikielisillä nuorilla on samat oikeudet kuin kenellä tahansa muulla nuorella tässä maassa. Heillä on oikeus tulla kohdelluksi tasa-arvoisesti, ilman ennakkoluuloja tai syrjintää. Heillä on oikeus tuntea, että he kuuluvat tähän yhteiskuntaan – eivätkä vain vierailijoina, vaan täysivaltaisina jäseninä.
Meidän on yhdessä luotava sellainen yhteiskunta, jossa nuoret voivat kasvaa ja kukoistaa ilman pelkoa tai epävarmuutta siitä, hyväksytäänkö heidät. Tämä ei tapahdu pelkästään kielen oppimisen tai kotouttamistoimenpiteiden kautta. Se vaatii meiltä kaikilta rohkeutta kohdata omat ennakkoluulomme, haastaa rakenteelliset ongelmat ja taistella sen puolesta, että jokainen nuori tuntee olevansa osa tätä yhteiskuntaa.
While politicians of the Finns Party (PS) and National Coalition Party beat their chests every time Finland tightens its migration policy, the two minor government parties, the Swedish People’s Party and Christian Democrats, look the other way with shameful silence.
The government, especially the PS, claims that its anti-immigration policies will make us stronger as a nation. The logic has a striking connection with the Nazi racebook. In that logic, they believed that getting rid of the Jews would help make the Germans realize their full potential and become the master race.
Today in Finland, like in other countries of the EU there is a similar logic: Let’s stop people like Muslims from settling inside our borders.
Finland’s transformation from a liberal Nordic welfare state to one that is showing signs of becoming iliberal is concerning to say the least. If there was a watershed that pushed Finland in this direction it was in July, when it approved the pushback law by denying people asylum thereby shelving its Human Rights commitments, Constitutional rights and internaitonal agreements.
This pictures the long struggle by Interior Minister Mari Rantanen, Finance Minister Riikka Purra, and the Perussuomalaiset* to shelve Human Rights, Constitutional Rights, and international agreements by Finland thanks to the passage of the pushback law in July. Source Twitter/Kalle Koponen, HS
Other shameful policy changes will weaken us and impoverish Finland.
Some of these include:
· changing the period of residence for citizenship from five to eight years; · tougher requirements to get permanent residence and citizenship; · prohibiting asylum seekers from getting a work permit; · residence permits granted under international protection will become temporary and their duration will be the EU minimum; · speeding up deportations and asylum applications; · tighter family reunification requirements; · if laid off and cannot find new employment, a person will be forced to leave the country in three (non-specialists) or six months (specialists); · taking away the right of undocumented migrants (excluding children and others in a particularly vulnerable position) to only have access to emergency health care services; · reviewing dual citizenship rights to Russian nationals.
A record number of suspected hate crimes* were reported in 2023, rising by 28.99% to 1,606 cases compared with 1,245 cases the previous year, according to the Police University College. The author of the report, Jenita Ranta, blamed “societal factors” like the Russian aggression in Ukraine, and the poor economic situation of people that fuel hate crime.
Ranta talks about these above factors but is silent about an obvious factor: racism in Finland.
Moreover, if last year was a record, we expect 2024 to be another record year when it comes to hate crimes.
The hate crimes reported to the police are only the tip of the iceberg.
As in previous years, hate crimes due to ethnic or national background stood at 68% of all hate crimes, rising last year by 17.42% to 1,092 cases versus 930 cases. That was followed by hate crimes on the grounds of religion or belief (10.3% of all hate crimes), which jumped by 36.36% to 165 cases.
By national group, the Somalis were one of the most affected by hate crimes as were Muslims.
The majority of hate crimes were physical assaults and verbal insults.
“Under this group, the biggest group of victims were Muslims. In the statistics on last year’s hate crime reports, it is noteworthy that for the first time ever, there were more suspected hate crimes against Jews or Jewishness than there were suspected hate crimes against Christians. However, Islamic people were most commonly targeted,” according to the Police University College.
Hate crimes committed against sexual minorities (10.6% of all hate crimes) rose by 53.57% to 215 cases, while disability (8%) saw the biggest rise, soaring 137.04% to 128 cases.
*”In general terms, hate crime is a crime motivated by prejudice or hostility towards the victim’s ethnic or national origin. The crime may also be targeted at members of the majority population.” Police University College
Watching a Yle news broadcast on the arrival of Filipino practical nurses at Helsinki-Vantaa Airport, I could not hold back my concern for these migrants and how they could fall prey to greedy employers. It has happened too many times before.
The government of Prime Minister Petteri Orpo, which continues to implement its racist and hardline migration policy, reiterated that it wants labor migrants from four countries: the Philippines, India, Vietnam, and Brazil. In the face of the government’s extreme tightening of migration policy, the government – especially the Perussuomalaiset (PS)* – would be willing to give migrants from these countries a chance to move to Finland and plug our chronic labor shortage.
Reading the minds and past policies of the PS and the National Coalition Party (NCP), it’s clear that some of these future practical nurses have fallen into a trap. Apart from living in a difficult climate and culture compared with their home country, they will be effectively at the mercy of their employers.
How long will it take before some of their stories of exploitation will come to light? This is a valid question because we not only have many cases backing up such a situation but also Finland’s unpreparedness to defend the rights of foreign workers.
Apart from this sad reality, Finland’s government and its migration policy are the clearest examples that parties like the PS will admit to a flaw in their demographic calculations but are ready to accept migrants who will not challenge their white Finnish privilege and promise to be subservient to the system.
Prioritizing migrants from four countries is a flawed plan that will only create more division among the migrant communities since the government has gone as far as to further categorize people as “good” and “undesireable” migrants.
Maahanmuuttajataustaisilla lapsilla ja nuorilla voi olla raskasta lukea jatkuvasti korkeassa asemassa olevien ihmisten levittämiä rasistisia tai syrjiviä viestejä. Tällaiset puheet saattavat herättää turvattomuuden tunnetta, ulkopuolisuuden kokemusta ja pelkoa.
Kun lapset ja nuoret huomaavat, että heidän taustaansa tai oppimistuloksiaan käytetään perusteena leimata heidät ongelmiksi, he voivat alkaa epäillä omaa arvoaan ja paikkaansa yhteiskunnassa.
Tällaiset puheet voivat johtaa myös siihen, että maahanmuuttajataustaiset lapset pelkäävät kouluun menemistä, koska he kokevat olevansa jo valmiiksi altavastaajia ja leimattuja. He voivat tuntea, että heidän täytyy todistella kykyjään jatkuvasti enemmän kuin muut, ja että heidän epäonnistumistaan käytetään todisteena heidän “kuulumattomuudestaan” tähän maahan.
Tämä voi lisätä paineita ja ahdistusta, ja pahimmillaan estää heitä osallistumasta täysipainoisesti koulunkäyntiin tai muuhun yhteiskunnan toimintaan. Tällaisessa ilmapiirissä kasvaessaan lapset ja nuoret eivät tunne olevansa tuettuja, vaan pikemminkin hylättyjä.
He voivat tuntea, että heitä syyllistetään asioista, joihin he eivät voi itse vaikuttaa, kuten maahanmuutosta tai siitä, kuinka kauan he ovat asuneet maassa. Tämä voi pahimmillaan estää heitä näkemästä tulevaisuudessaan mahdollisuuksia ja uskomasta itseensä.
On tärkeää, että päättäjät ja aikuiset ylipäätään viestivät näille lapsille, että heitä arvostetaan ja tuetaan, ja että heidän taustansa ei määritä heidän arvoaan tai mahdollisuuksiaan.
The rise of the far-right and their simplistic scapegoating of migrants and minorities reveals a sad reality hitting Europe. The rise of the far-right does not expose the obvious but the fact that we have failed to educate generations after the horrors of World War 2.
If there is one matter that characterizes an autocratic state like Nazi Germany, it is the fact that the system gave people the right to oppress and murder on an industrial scale. It wasn’t the “rotten apples” at the top who made it possible, but with the support of the masses.
Teaching and institutionalizing racism, us versus them, is a sure way of gaining political and finally, autocratic power, as we saw in Germany after 1933.
Populism is like a drug addict who needs a constant. The drug addict gets the fix but it does not resolve his main problem: addiction and destruction of the person’s physical and mental health.
In Finland, the “drug-addict” political parties that capitalize on scapegoating migrants and minorities are the Perussuomalaiset (PS)*, National Coalition Party (NCP), and Christian Democrats, and to an ambivalent extent the Swedish People’s Party and Social Democrats.
Only the Greens and Left Alliance have given a flat no to the present political development that normalizes racism and social exclusion.
The saying sits well with Prime Minister Petteri Orpo’s government. Can you teach a party like the Perussuomalaiset (PS)* to be civil and ditch their racism? For the PS to turn in a new political leaf and abandon their nationalist rants and xenophobia would be tantamount to political harakiri.
One matter that I have never grasped and accepted is how so-called mainstream parties like the National Coalition Party (NCP), the media, allow politicians of the PS to bash and denegrate migrants and minorities.
The latest scandal to hit the government involves minister of foreign trade and development, Ville Tavio, a PS politician who has made a name for himself as a far-right homophobe, Islamophobe and xenophobe.
The unilateral decision by Tavio not to participate in a gender-equality alliance for the rebuiling of Ukraine which also include sexual minorities, has received a lot of criticsm from President Alexander Stubb.
“I hope that in the future we will not see similar mistakes from the ministry for foreign affairs, that the president will not be informed of matters that belong to the minister for foreign trade and development cooperation, but are related to our foreign and security policy,” Stubb was quoted as saying in Yle News.
Just as the dust was settling, Tavio was quoted in Helsingin Sanomat by stating: “I support the rights of sexual minorities. The Perussuomalaiset will secure a better Finland for sexual minorities in general by opposing Islamzation.”
Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Ville Tavio. Source: Kauppalehti.
Even if we can point out the NCP’s political sin of going to bed with the PS, Finland has the government it deserves. If you look at their over first year in government, the question is what type of Finland will we have at the end of their term in 2027?
What will our welfare state look like and how much will social inequality grow and polarize our country? Would you dare to see? It would be naive to believe that Prime Minister Petteri Orpo’s government will strengthen our welfare state The only matter it will strengthen is social inequality. As mentioned in a previous posting, about one third of Finnish voters are racist. The rise of the PS is a good example of the latter.
Going back to the original question: Can you teach a dog new tricks?
No, but if its racism is stongly grounded on racism, nationalism and social exclusion, then you can. The dog does not learn new tricks per se but is emboldened to carry out its old tricks.
