Almost two days have elapsed since the Oulu mosque was the target of vandalism. Did you read from any government minister expressed concern about what happened? What about the City of Oulu, which has labelled all asylum seekers as potential sex offenders by banning such people from visiting child care centers and schools?
Where is the leadership and outrage after the Oulu mosque was vandalized Tuesday for the ninth time?
The media was especially active about reporting about the sexual assault cases. A Migrant Tales story revealed that from November 27 to February 13, Ylealone had published 77 stories on the topic. On one day (January 14), it had published 13 stories.
With the knee-jerk reaction of the government and City of Oulu to the sexual assault cases, which some would interpret as racist, shouldn’t these officials attend a basic course on cultural diversity and anti-racism?
In December, when the mosque was vandalized for a seventh and eight time, the Lutheran Church did express concern and offered its solidarity.
What do the silence and inaction say about the state of Finland?
The Oulu mosque was vandalized Tuesday for the ninth time since September 2017, according to Dr Abdul Mannan, who heads the Islamic Society of Northern Finland.The police said in a statement the attack took place at 5:10 am when a suspect smashed a window with a bike rack and threw a smoke grenade inside the premises. The fire department was called as well.
Dr Mannan said that the attacks against the mosque are becoming too common and he is hopeful that the perpetrator is caught.
The suspect used a bike rack to smash the window at 5.10 am and threw a smoke grenade inside the premises. Source: Dr Abdul Amman.
The prayer matt damaged by the smoke grenade (left) with smashed glass lying over the floor and chair. Photo: Dr Abdul Mannan.
“We installed a new very good surveillance system that should [hopefully] help to identify and capture the culprit,” he said.
Dr Mannan makes no effort to hide his frustration.
“I have said many times that the media is not helping the situation but adding fuel to the fire,” he said. “The most recent attack against our mosque is an example of how hate speech encourages some to acts of violence.”
Dr Mannan said that it was unfair to blame Muslims for what happened in Oulu concerning the sexual assault cases.
“None of the suspects in custody are members of our congregation,” he said. “Muslims of Oulu are law-abiding and should not be the target of people’s anger and hate.”
The question Migrant Tales asked a while back if the City of Oulu’s decision to ban visits by asylum seekers to child care centers and schools is legal. Can you ban a single group, in this case, asylum seekers, from visiting such places? As far as how the law works in Finland, the ban should apply to everyone and not to one specific group.
As we all know, the ban is due to the sexual assault cases where some 16 “persons of migrant background” – code for asylum seeker, Muslim, non-EU nationals – are suspects.
We got in touch with the Non-Discrimination Ombudsman about this and have yet to get a call back from them.
The same goes for the City of Oulu’s Director of Education and Culture Mika Penttilä. He has not called back after repeated phone calls.
Section 6 of the Constitution states the following: “Everyone is equal before the law. No one shall, without an acceptable reason, be treated differently from other persons on the ground of sex, age, origin, language, religion, conviction, opinion, health, disability or other reason that concerns his or her person.”
How should we interpret Section 6 of the Constitution? If there is a ban, like the one in Oulu, it must apply to everyone.
The ban, which is an overreaction and I believe illegal, is making Oulu trip over itself due to a lack of political leadership and the parliamentary elections in April.
An elementary school in Oulu was the target of recent attacks on social media due to a false rumor that asylum seekers had visited the school. Kello School principal, Timo Soini, said that the attacks amounted to threats and insults, according to Yle.
“Two women and a man visited [the school] last week who were of multicultural origin and Finnish citizens,” said Soini. “They have lived in Finland all their lives and came to give talks to middle school students about discrimination and racism.”
What is the difference between the far-right Perussuomalaiset (PS)* and Blue Reform party? The PS is openly racist while Blue Reform is a racist party with a bow tie. Both are racist parties that aim retarding and undermining migrants, minorities and Others from having a greater voice in Finland.
Their aim is to keep Finland white by denying Others their rightful place in our society. They are not interested in integration but on how to teach and keep migrants and minorities as second- and third-class citizens.
Both the PS and Blue Reform are an aberration that represent the worst of our society. They are the first modern party that uses Islamophobic and xenophobic rhetoric to gain political party.
Sampo Terho, the chairperson and minister for European affairs, culture and sport, has the audacity to state below that we need to “manage immigration.” Manage?! After his former party, the PS, spearheaded tougher immigration laws that tightened family reunification and did away with residence permits on humanitarian grounds?! These types of policies not only told asylum seekers that we don’t want you here but created thousands of undocumented migrants from a few hundred before.
WARNING: RACIST CONTENT – We need to “manage Immigration” is one of Terho’s favorite catchphrases. What he is saying is that we should clean up the mess his party created in government concerning immigration and asylum policy.
Alaikäisten avioliitot kielletään vihdoin Suomessa. Asia on oikea, mutta tapa, jolla oikeusministeri Häkkänen markkinoi lainvalmistelua itselleen vaaliaseeksi, on vastenmielinen.
Kun Häkkänen sopivasti näin vaalien alla kehaisee Twitterissä: ”Aloittaessani oikeusministerinä pöydälleni tuotiin alaikäisten tyttöjen hakemuksia avioliittoon. Pidin tätä maan tapaa vääränä ja käynnistin lainvalmistelun, jolla alaikäisten avioliitot kielletään Suomessa. Lapsia on suojeltava. @kokoomus”, Keskustan Aila Paloniemi käy kuittaamassa; ”Eduskunnassa on toistuvasti nostettu lapsiavioliittojen kieltäminen esille. Hyvä, että olemme voineet olla vauhdittamassa ministeriön lainvalmistelua. Yhteistyöllä syntyvät parhaat tulokset !”
Monet ovatkin pitäneet tätä tärkeää asiaa esillä ja useimmat varmasti vilpittömästi kaikkia lapsia suojellakseen.
Antti Häkkäsen Twitter-seinältä käy ilmi, mille äänestäjäryhmälle asian käsittely ja sen nosto otsikoihin juuri nyt on tarkoitettu:
Lopettakaa näiden laittomien turvapaikanhakijoiden tulo niin loppuu ne anomuksetkin.Menikö jakeluun.
Parempi myöhään kuin ei milloinkaan! Mutta mitäs jos lapsi lähetetään kotimaahansa avioitumaan, voiko Suomessa tehdä asialle mitään? Kun ympärileikkauksistakin vaietaan rasismin pelossa, ainakin koulujen henkilökunta eli juuri he jotka asiasta voisivat tietää?
Hyvä @anttihakkanen !! Nämä lapsiavioliitot ovat sairasta!
Kuvaavaa on se, että Häkkänen ei millään lailla korjaa sitä käsitystä, että hakemukset tulevat muslimeilta ja nimenomaan pikkutyttöjen naimiseksi.
Onko nyt niin, että Antti on päässyt peräti ministeriksi, mutta ei keksi muita tapoja kuin rasistien kutittelu uusiakseen kansanedustajan mandaattinsa? Vain onko Kokoomuksen sisällä rasistien kilpailu jo niin tiukkaa, että kaikkien pitää näyttää kykynsä tällä alueella pysyäkseen johtoportaan mielessä?
Tunteisiin ja muukalaisvihaan tätäkään asiaa ei tarvitse vaalien alla perustaa. Oikeusministeriössäkin on asiaa tarkasteltu asia- ja tilastopohjalta ja muistio alaikäisavioliittojen sääntelytarpeesta on julkaistu kesäkuussa 2018.
Ministeri Häkkäsen ministerivuosina 2017-18 tehdyistä päätöksistä en löytänyt tietoa tuosta paperista tai muualta. Vuonna 2016 on hakemuksia alle 18- vuotiaiden avioitumisesta jätetty 8 kpl ja lupia myönnetty 5, vuonna 2015 hakemuksia oli 14 ja lupia myönnettiin 8. Kovin suurta anomusnippua ei siis liene Häkkäsen pöydälle laskettu seuraavinakaan vuosina, eikä pikkulasten vuoksi ole herran ihan tarvinnut surusta riutua, kun hakijat lienevät olleet enimmäkseen n. 17-vuotiaita, kuten aiemminkin.
Useimmiten poikkeusluvan myöntämisen perusteena on ollut uskonnollinen vakaumus. Alle 17-vuotiaille on tarvittu perusteeksi raskaus. Vuosien 2010 – 2016 aikana 80 prosentissa tapauksista molemmat hakijat ovat olleet Suomen kansalaisia. Alle 16-vuotias on saanut avioliittoluvan vain yhden ainoan kerran (v. 2012), jolloin poikkeuslupa myönnettiin raskauden perusteella 15-vuotiaalle tytölle ja hänen 18-vuotiaalle puolisolleen.
A year has elapsed since Rashid H., a Pakistani migrant, was brutally attacked by three white Finnish youths in Vantaa on a Friday, February 23. The attack not only changed Rashid’s and his family’s life permanently, what happened also spread fear in the Pakistani community of Finland.
Rashid and his wife Sobia have two daughters aged six and one.
On visiting the couple, one of the matters you notice is not only the past but the future and their will to make the best out of a terrible situation. Rashid is recovering slowly and is on sick leave until the end of 2019.
“Rashid takes two types of painkillers and even Panadol if both don’t do the job,” she said. “On top of that, he also takes medicine for blood pressure and he is a diabetic.”
On the left, a statement by the police about what happened to Rashid. On the right is the profile picture of the new NGO, Anti-Hate Crime Organisation Finland, which founded in September thanks to Rashid and his wife. The picture on the right is of a man who was threatened by the Polish police.He did not want his face to appear in the picture. Source: Police and photo by Enrique Tessieri.
An important part of the recovery and healing process is getting support from psychologists, other health officials, family and friends. “Recovery sessions with the psychologist have helped us a lot but there is still a way to go,” she said.
March 2018
I met Rashid, his wife and daughters the first time at the Meilahti Hospital of Helsinki. With stitches and bruises on his body, Rashid demonstrated a strong will to recover and overcome what had happened.
“When I get out of here and get better,” he said almost a year ago. “I want to help others by telling them what is hate crime and what happened to me so that others could learn.”
The promise he had made at the hospital came true. Rashid and his wife helped found Anti-Hate Crime Organisation Finland (Suomen viharikosvasainen yhdistys ry) in September. On March 21, the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Rashid and Sobia will give a talk to students and migrants in Otava near Mikkeli.
The new founding board members of Anti-Hate Crime Organisation Finland. The NGO was founded on September 8 in Helsinki and registered on October 3 by the Finnish Patent and Registration Office (PRH).
It’s difficult to grasp what happened to Rashid and how he survived. His attackers had stabbed him up to thirty times, fractured his skull with an axe and jabbed him several times with another pointed object. His blood stains were left near the apartment building for twenty days after the attack despite repeated calls by his wife to the social office and police to remove them.
With parliamentary elections a heartbeat away on April 14, the populist far-right Perussuomalaiset (PS)* party announced that anti-immigration will be their main campaign theme. Are we surprised? Not in the bit.
PS Chairperson Jussi Halla-aho was quoted as saying in Yle that at the present rate, Finland’s immigration policy will destroy present levels of social welfare, undermine good salaries, good schools, gender equality among other problems.
“We want to make it tougher for people to move here,” he said. “We want to raise the requirements to get Finnish citizenship.”
Kokoomuslainen sisäministeri on tänään järjestänyt tiedotustilaisuuden, jossa kerrotaan, kuinka seksuaalirikoksia ja maahanmuuttoa aletaan tomerasti käsitellä, jos Kokoomus on vaalien jälkeen hallituksessa. Maahanmuutto ja seksuaalirikokset kun ovat itse asiassa ihan sama asia. Rajat auki ja seksuaalirikollinen puikahtaa sisään.
Kokoomuksen, Keskustan ja muuntopersujen ehdotukset ovat kuitenkin täysin vaillinaisia ja Jussi Halla-ahonkin mielestä vain yritys näin vaalien alla kalastella äänestäjiä hänen kustannuksellaan, onhan hän sentään jo vuosia osannut puhua maahanmuuttajataustaisten taipumuksista selvästi suoremmin sanoin. Suorat sanat ovat nyt valttia, Ylekin on jo alkanut puhua selkein sanoin maahanmuuttajavaarasta: seksuaalista uhkaa aiheuttavat nopeasti säilöön!
Median ja poliitikkojen luoma uhka näkyy selvästi, kun kirjoittaa Googleen hakusanan: “Oulun raiskaukset”
Näillä toimilla maahan jäisivät edelleen lähes kaikki maahanmuuttajataustaiset ihmiset, ja sehän se juuri on hallituksen mukaan uhka sisäiselle turvallisuudelle.
Minulla on briljantti ehdotus Kokoomukselle ja muillekin hallituspuolueille: aina, kun suomalainen tekee seksuaalirikoksen, lähetetään Suomesta pois yksi maahanmuuttajataustainen. Heidän mukanaan saadaan suomalaisten arvojen vastainen kulttuuri ulos Suomesta. Vähä vähältä, mies kerrallaan.
Nyt suomalaisten tekemiä seksuaalirikoksia tulee julki noin 1000 vuodessa, mutta raiskaustukikeskukset ovat kertoneet, että raiskausten määrä on jopa kymmenkertainen. Kun peruskansa huomaa, että tällä konstilla saadaan melko nopeasti kaikki muukalaiset ulos, myös raiskauksista poliisille tehdyt ilmoitukset lisääntyvät.
Maahanmuuttovirastokin voidaan pian lakkauttaa, koska maahan saapuneet turvapaikanhakijat voidaan välittömästi keskittää hallituksen jo rakennuttamiin säilöihin odottamaan raiskauspalautusta. Turvapaikkahakemusten käsittely on uudessa järjestelmässä ajanhukkaa. Vastaanottokeskukset onkin jo kaukokatseisesti lähes lakkautettu ja Kokoomushan on jälleen ehdottanut uusien säilytysleirien rakentamista Eurooppaan. Tärkeintä onkin saada palautettavat nopeasti pois Suomen rajojen sisäpuolelta, jottei kulttuuri ehtisi tarttua.
Kun turvapaikanhakijat ovat loppuneet, voidaan alkaa palauttaa muita vääryydellä rajan ylittäneitä seksuaalivaaroja. Ehkä ensimmäiseksi palautetaan IT-hommiin tulleet naimattomat nuoret miehet, sillä heidän raiskaustaipumuksensa on ilmeinen ja se juuri on omiaan aiheuttamaan oikeutettua pelkoa kunnollisissa suomalaisen kulttuurin miehissä ja ministereissä.
The editorial below by the Alabama-based Democrat-Reporter, calling on the Ku Klux Klan “to ride again” and lynch Democrats, was not published in the last century but in 2019. This editorial is a good example that the United States is a racist country and has done too little to eradicate this social ill.
It is the same story in Europe, which explains why populist far-right parties are on the rise and gaining support.
The United States had a Civil Rights Movement (1955-68) and Europe World War 2 (1939-45). In both cases, there was a lack of resolve to do away with racism and its poison. Governments and school boards searched instead for the status quo. We are paying today a high price for our mistake.
This is understandable because those who held power benefited from the privileges that racism bestows on them.
Do we have similar examples in Europe and Finland?
European examples of the latter would be Marine Le Pen of France, Holland’s Gert Wilders, Viktor Orbán and many others. In Finland, two candidates that come to mind are Jussi Halla-aho and Laura Huhtsaari of the Perussuomalaiset (PS)* party.
The scandal facing elderly care homes under the management of stock-listed companies such as Attendo, Esperi Care and Mehiläinen points to one issue: lack of effective regulation. Why are Filipino employees at these establishments exploited? The answer: lack of effective regulation.
Even if you file charges to the police about exploitation at work, hate crime, or racist harassment, such cases may take months before they ever see a courtroom. Add to the latter the lack of effective regulation, and gravity of the problem becomes clear.
While this is sadly the case, the question we should ask is why we allow this to go on? Why is there so little political will and interest as well as lack of resources to correct the situation? The answer: These types of attitudes serve to reinforce and maintain the pillars of institutional racism.
Instead of protecting migrant workers’ rights in Finland, we divert our attention from such abuses by another racist debate about how migrants are criminals and abuse social welfare. A good example of the latter was an empty interview on TV with Perussuomalaiset Chairperson Jussi Halla-aho.
Halla-aho spewed his usual racist comments while the reporter, Kirsi Heikel, bowed submissively.
Even the Oulu sexual assault cases beg a sensible question of the police and social workers: Did they do their jobs? Lack of effective regulation? Is it easier to pin the blame on asylum seekers?
It all boils down to denial and lack of effective regulation.
* The Perussuomalaiset (PS) party imploded on June 13, 2017, into two factions, the PS and New Alternative, which is now called Blue Reform. Despite the name changes, we believe that it is the same party in different clothing. Both factions are hostile to cultural diversity never mind Muslims and other visible minorities. One is more open about it while the other says it in a different way.
A direct translation of Perussuomalaiset in English would be something like “basic” or “fundamental Finn.” Official translations of the Finnish name of the party, such as Finns Party or True Finns, promote in our opinion nativist nationalism and racism. We, therefore, at Migrant Tales prefer to use in our postings the Finnish name of the party once and after that the acronym PS.
