HS: Study finds immigrants and native Finns treated differently in foster care cases

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: As we know more and each of the claims by anti-immigrant groups are studied closer, we usually end up with exaggerated claims where key facts are purposefully left out. One of the favorites by these groups has been that immigrants get better treatment than Finns due to cultural sensitivity.

A doctoral dissertation by Tampere University social scientist Johanna Hiitola argues the contrary.

Writes Helsingin Sanomat (HS):  “Court documents would often describe native Finnish mothers as exhausted and fatigued, while the mothers of immigrant families in similar circumstances were said to be incapable of caring for their children.”

“According to the documents, a third of native Finnish mothers suffered from exhaustion. None of the mothers of an immigrant background were seen to have exhaustion as the reason for their problems,” Hiitola says.

More of these types of studies should be encouraged in order to get a realistic and fair view of the situation. 

Thank you JusticeDemon for the heads up.

_______________

A fresh study has found that Finnish administrative courts treat immigrant families and native Finns differently in cases involving decisions on placing children in foster care. Initial results of the yet-to-be released doctoral thesis of Tampere University social scientist Johanna Hiitola were presented at a child welfare seminar in MIkkeli on Wednesday.  In her study Hiitola examined documents related to decisions in 343 cases in administrative court involving involuntary foster care in 2008. She found clear differences in how the matters of native Finnish and immigrant families were handled.

Read whole story.

“Living together:” Council of Europe Eminent Persons’ report

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: It is not only long-overdue but vital that Europe answers forcefully the threat posed by the rise of intolerance, racism and xenophobia. All of us as members of society can and must do our part to challenge these threats to our democratic institutions by right-wing populist parties.

I don’t have any doubts about placing the Perussuomalaiset  (PS) as one of these parties in Europe that aim to undermine our values and democratic institutions. Even though they have the right to take part in elections, what is unacceptable is the racism and hostility of a large number of their MPs towards immigrants and minorities in Finland.

“Diversity is here to stay,” said the Council of Europe’s Secretary General,  Thorbjørn Jagland. “We have to learn to live with it, manage it, and benefit from it.”

The Council of Europe Eminent Persons’ report identifies the following risks to our values: “rising intolerance; rising support for xenophobic and populist parties; discrimination; the presence of a population virtually without rights; parallel societies; Islamic extremism; loss of democratic freedoms; and a possible clash between “religious freedom” and freedom of expression. Behind these risks, it suggests, lie insecurity (stemming from Europe’s economic difficulties and sense of relative decline); the phenomenon of large-scale immigration (both as actually experienced and as perceived); distorted images and harmful stereotypes of minorities in the media and public opinion; and a shortage of leaders who can inspire confidence by articulating a clear vision of Europe’s destiny.”

Migrant Tales will never give up its passion for democracy and civil rights and identify those groups and individuals that want to breathe life to twenty-first century fascism. Migrant Tales does not fear identifying such groups and individuals who belong to the PS and associations like Suomen Sisu.

________

On behalf of the Council of Europe Group of Eminent Persons, Javier Solana Madariaga  presented the report “Living Together:” Combining diversity and freedom in 21st-century Europe to the Committee of Ministers session meeting in Istanbul. Taking stock of the challenges arising from the resurgence of intolerance and discrimination in Europe, the report analyses “the threat” and proposes “the response” for “living together” in open European societies. 

Read whole story.

Speaking up for Multicultural Finns

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Those who play down the impact and poison of racism and indifference in our society know nothing of the plight of Multicultural Finns. Who are they?

A Multicultural Finn is any person who may have grown up in Finland but one or both of his or her parents were born in another country. They can also be native Finns with Finnish parents who grew up in foreign countries.

Like any group that grew up in two or more cultures, prejudice and society’s indifference have been felt especially hard by them.

Groups that have declared war on Finland’s cultural diversity, like many MPs of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party, associations like Suomen Sisu and others, impact Multicultural Finns especially hard with their message of indifference.

Whenever these groups point out that Finns should not marry foreigners, or that Finland should remain “white,” they are by the same token denying Multicultural Finns of their rightful and long-overdue acceptance by society.

Acceptance by them of Multicultural Finns would be a death-blow to their myopic view of Finnishness and who has the right to belong to it.

Multicultural Finns are one of the most disenfranchised groups in this country. In school some face constant ridicule and exclusion not only by some of their classmates but with the help of their teachers’ silence.

The damage hits their self-esteem because they are denied a part of their identity, or both in many cases.

They are eternal outsiders due to society’s indifference and denial of their history and identity.

Their acceptance, however, will grow in Finland during this century as our society becomes more culturally diverse.

Why do I write about them and why do I care?

Because I am one of them.  We are the future of Finland today.

Was the Garden of Eden Finnish?

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Most Finns know that this is a preposterous statement but some would agree that Adam and Eve were Finnish. This minority claims that since Finns have not mixed with anyone culturally never mind ethnically, the Garden of Eden must have been Finnish.

Some Finns who are pushing these pseudo-theories and myths of Finns and  Finland are well-known politicians who belong to parties like the Perussuomalaiset and associations like Suomen Sisu and Suomalaisuuden Liitto.

The problem with these types of parties and associations is that their arguments are based on brittle myths.  They use all types of underhanded tactics to defend their arguments with the help of racism and xenophobia, among others.

I will now proceed to drop a bombshell on them with a simple question: If you trace your family back twenty generations, how many ancestors would you have? How wide of an area would they be spread apart?

Check out this video clip for the answer.*

* You would have over a million ancestors, or 1,048,576 to be exact. Are you certain we’re not related?

Ilatlehti: Miehet hakkasivat somaliperheen ovea sorkkaraudalla

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Here is another case of hostile racism by thugs against a Somalian family in Espoo. What is surprising is that the story was published today even if it happened in October 2010, according to tabloid Iltalehti.

What would you do if a bunch of racist ruffians started shouting and banging at your door with crowbars? Inside the apartment were four adults and two children. The youngest was six years old. 

These types of attacks are a grim reminder of the racism in Finland.  They are a permanent shame on our country’s good name.

___________

Oluen voimalla iltaansa viettäneet espoolaiset nuoret miehet päättivät mennä naapuritaloon kiusaamaan talossa asuvaa maahanmuuttajaperhettä. Motiivi löytyi siitä, että yhdellä kyseisen somaliperheen nuorista miehistä oli ollut aiemmin pihalla riitaa samassa taloyhtiössä asuvan 24-vuotiaan suomalaismiehen kanssa.

Read whole story.

Leave my multicultural Finnish identity alone!

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Many of the arguments used by the anti-immigration camp in this country is based on myths from nineteenth century Finnish history. When these groups declare war on multiculturalism what they are revealing is their denial of our cultural diversity as a nation.

When a person or group openly oppose multiculturalism in Finland they’ll never tell you how they plan to make Finland ethnically homogeneous.

Certainly Nazi Germany’s ethnic policies are one horrific reminder of what happened when racial homogeneity became an aim of state policy. Never in the history of humankind have we seen such systematic mass murder on such a grand scale as during Nazi Germany. Not even Stalin’s purges or Pol Pot regime’s killing fields come close.

But let’s ask the following question to those that deny Finland’s cultural diversity:  How can we be “ethnically and culturally homogeneous” if our country was part of Sweden and under Russian rule for six hundred years? How about the over one million Finns that left this country as immigrants in the past 150 years?

Some of these so-called critics who are vehemently against immigration and cultural diversity make it sound as if Finns evolved separately from other groups. There was no genetic and cultural mixing with anyone, period.

These types of arguments, used by parties like Persussuomalaiset (PS) MPs like Jussi Halla-aho, are based on myths that are deeply rooted in nineteenth century Finnish national identity. Instead of celebrating and encouraging  our diversity as Finns after 1917, we erased it in order to build a national identity.

While nationalism was one important cultural eraser that encouraged Finns, for example, to change their surnames after independence and hide and even be ashamed of their cultural  diversity, it has become today one of the biggest obstacles in accepting immigrants and multicultural Finns.

Groups like Suomalaisuuden Liitto have through the PS declared open war against our Swedish-speaking minority.

New Finns is in many respects a deceptive label because we are not speaking of “new” Finns per se but in some cases quite old ones whom we have forgotten or erased from our collective memory. Jews and Russians are just a few to begin with.

Ever wonder why a Nazi-spirited association like Suomen Sisu or its members like Halla-aho don’t openly condemn the works of David Duke? It is because this former Klu Klux Klan member is an enemy of multiculturalism, or cultural diversity.

The video below on an interview with Duke exposes Suomen Sisu’s mindset in a Finnish context. In a recent television program Halla-aho refused to condemn the works of Duke and Alfred Rosenberg, a former Nazi pseudo-philosopher who defended ethnic homogeneity as a state virtue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd69pe_cL08&feature=related

My message to anyone who messes with my multicultural Finnish background is simple, loud and clear: Leave it alone and learn to accept it. If you don’t, that is your problem.

Suomen Kuvalehti.fi: Aziz Sheikhani: Maahanmuuttajat tarvitsevat oman puolueen

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Azis Shekhani poses an interesting question that has crossed the minds of many in Finland: Should immigrants establish their own political party?

Shekhani argues that since immigrants have not succeeded at getting MPs elected on the ticket of traditional political parties and have taken part in the political process in good faith, a good way to change matters would be to form a political party made up immigrants and Finns.

With the municipal elections taking place next year, one way of running for office would be without the backing of any political party. It could be a good way to protest against the present situation and the hostile climate.

What do you think?

__________

Azis Shekhani

Maahanmuuttajat ovat osa suomalaista yhteiskuntaa. Heidän määränsä on kasvamassa, toinen sukupolvi on varttumassa. Heidän tulevaisuutensa ja paikkansa suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa on kiinni kantaväestön asenteesta ja antamista mahdollisuuksista. Valitettavasti maahanmuuttajia on laman ja vaalien aikana arvosteltu, ja median ja puolueiden mielipiteet Suomeen muuttaneista eivät ole olleet myönteisiä.

Read whole story.

The New York Review of Books: A New Approach to the Holocaust

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: The New York Review of Books  offers some of the best analysis around on history and contemporary affairs. If you are going to subscribe to this excellent journal, you have to set aside a lot of time to read the lengthy and well-written reviews.

The Holocaust will always live by us like an ugly reminder of our savagery, or in particular of a regime that based its existence on racism and ethnic homogeneity. Some have asked on Migrant Tales what does the adjective “Nazi-spirited” mean before an association like Suomen Sisu? The answer is in its racial views and, like the Nazis, to the idea that ethnic homogeneity is an important value that society should strive to maintain.

This idea is not only shared openly by PS MPs like Jussi Halla-aho who are emembers of Suomen Sisu, but by many far-right populist parties in Europe like the Sweden Democrats and others. In other words, their reason for being and aim is based on their objection to multiculturalism, or cultural diversity, which is a threat to  ethnic homogeneity. 

One matter that these parties and associations don’t tell you is how they plan to preserve never mind return their countries back to some “ethnically homogeneous” society. Taking into account that over a million Finns emigrated from here in the last 150 years and that Finland has always been a part of Europe, we can even argue if we’ve ever been ethnically homogeneous. 

Ethnic homogeneity as an ideal of society has its roots in racism and most recently to the rise of fascism in the 1930s.

This explains as well why PS MPs like Halla-aho and Suomen Sisu don’t openly condemn the works of Alfred Rosenberg and David Duke. Halla-aho even plays down the Nuremberg Trials.  “It is quite justifiable to see the Nuremberg trials as a farce,” he wrote. “Sure, the guilty had been condemned in advance and their convictions carried out on absurd grounds.”

Peter Longereich’s Holocaust not only tells us how misguided Nazi Germany was concerning their pathological ethnic policies but how it led to mass murder when they tried to implement them and make their country and occupied territories ethnically homogeneous. If the Nazi ideology failed in this task and caused as a result the systematic murder and social engineering through death camps and deportation of millions of Europeans, it is doubtful that far-right parties will ever succeed in the task today.

Do you agree?

__________

It is fruitless to reduce the manifold evil of the Holocaust to a single cause. Ideology, charisma, conformism, hatred, greed, and war were all very important, but each was related to the others and all mattered within rapidly changing historical circumstances. In his profound study Holocaust, Peter Longerich puts forward an analysis that includes all these factors and shows how politics or, as he puts it, Politik, set them all in motion. In this amplified English edition of his Politik der Vernichtung (1998), Longerich preserves the German term Judenpolitik, and with good reason. In German Politik means both “politics” and “policy,” and the compound noun (Juden + Politik) gives a sense of a joining of concepts that English cannot quite convey.

Read whole story.

Aikalainen: Tyhmää kansaa valistetaan

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: One of the most interesting matters that media culture Professor Mikko Lehtonen states in the Tampere University publication, Aikalainen, is that the rise of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) was helped by the traditional parties that didn’t look down on some aspects of their campaign message.  

“If for example the Social Democrats would not have started to clearly go in that direction but would have stated that we have certain constitutional values and a certain welfare state tradition, it could have challenged this (PS) phenomenon,” said Lehtonen.  “I think the old political elite could take a look at itself in the mirror.”

Lehtonen is correct in stating that by not challenging strongly enough the rise of the PS, the traditional parties fuelled it with their lack of counterarguments and silence. This can be seen as well in the Finnish media that appeared in many cases like its US counterpart before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  Only a few publications, like The New York Review of Books, questioned the US-led invasion.

Even though Lehtonen doesn’t state what aspect of the PS message appealed to the traditional parties, we could make a case that one of these was their anti-immigration and anti-Islam stance.  Did the PS awaken their xenophobia and ignorance of immigration and refugee issues?

Another point that Lehtonen makes is about the core PS voter, who is a 20-35 year old man with little education.

“Rarely are the PS supporters spoken of in a positive fashion by the media,” Lehtonen says. “They are always something else and always a problem. In this respect they remind us a lot of how immigrants are spoken of (in public).”

Do you agree?

________________

Heikki Laurinolli

Mediakulttuurin professori löytää persujen suosiosta vasemmiston heikkoutta ja identiteettipolitiikan nousua. Perussuomalaisten nousun syynä on vasemmiston heikkous ja kyvyttömyys miettiä identiteettipolitiikan kannalta esimerkiksi maahanmuuttoa. Näin arvioi Tampereen yliopiston mediakulttuurin professori Mikko Lehtonen kevään eduskuntavaalitulosta.

Read whole story.

The dark side of Finland that has me concerned

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

When historians look at this period and study how the ogre of racism got such a big foothold in Finland, they will probably conclude that it was always there but found one of its homes in the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party. When they point out how some Finns tried to make xenophobia and racism a “normal” matter in Finland, a long list of PS politicians will emerge.

The most startling fact these researchers will stumble upon is that the role of racism got a more public face thanks to the paralysis that struck the country’s main politicians and the media, which is today starting to be more outspoken against this social ill.

This kind of country, which has its values in the right place but has taken for granted a threat like racism, is what scares me. It shows how easily we can lose our society to extremists. All you need is to feed spite, find the right scapegoats and spread myths and exaggerated rhetoric.

That is why we not only need to defend our civil rights every day but distinguish those who are dressed in sheep’s clothing and who want to destroy them.

Parties like the PS have no place ruling Finland as long as they do not even respect the will of the majority. By the majority we mean the overwhelming  majority (80.9%) who didn’t vote for the PS or side with their anti-EU policies and populist style of politics.

The fact that the PS didn’t even want to take part in the formation of the next government is a good example of how Timo Soini’s party is more talk than action.

Holding a whole country hostage to Soini’s anti-EU policies should outrage Finns as well as many other aspects of the PS.