

Lue alkuperänen Facebook juttu tästä.
Postaus julkaistu luvalla.
Twenty-five days have passed since Ali,* 22, who speaks on condition of anonymity, “voluntarily” returned to Iraq from Finland. Sometimes the journey back to where you were once from is longer than the one that took you to foreign lands. The first journey fueled by hope and the other one back to your former homeland with question marks and doubts.
Below is the first message I received from Ali when he landed in Baghdad on May 21:


He continues (the comment was lightly edited) in a message dated May 23:
“Well yeah it is so exhausting [the journey back], but that feeling when you see ur mom after long, long time it’s the best feeling in the world; [it’s the same feeling when you] also my brother and some friends, but still, for sure, there’s that feeling of not being safe etc.. it makes me think too much but I don’t wanna think of it, like it’s like that and [there is] nothing i can do so.. but i feel good and all good for now. And also i feel like it’s been 100 years when i was here last time and things are not the same…”
This evening when I spoke to Ali he repeated what he said in Finland and on his return to Baghdad: “Even if I’m here I still don’t believe that I’m back. It’s a weird feeling because I never saw myself returning.”
Continue reading “Ali’s journey (June 13, 2018): The long journey back. Baghdad feels like a sauna”
Valtioneuvoston virallisilla nettisivuilla kerrotaan näin:
”Tasavallan presidentti nimitti 29. toukokuuta 2015 pääministeri Juha Sipilän hallituksen, joka on itsenäisen Suomen 74. hallitus. Hallituksen muodostavat Suomen Keskusta, Sininen tulevaisuus ja Kansallinen Kokoomus. Sipilän hallituksessa on 17 ministeriä.”
Koska valtioneuvoston tiedottajalle on tuossa sattunut pieni virhe, ajattelin palauttaa mieliin vain vuoden takaisia tapahtumia. Jotta kansa ei unohtaisi.
Toukokuussa 2015 hallitusta oli Keskustan ja Kokoomuksen kanssa muodostamassa Perussuomalaiset rp. Valitettavasti.
Juha Sipilä & kumpp. ajattelivat kai silloin, että rasistisimman eduskuntapuolueen johtoon ja joukkoon ovat ajautuneet kansakunnan parhaat kyvyt. Ehkäpä sellainenkin seikka käväisi mielessä, että viha ja muukalaispelko aatteina ovat niitä kaikkein nostavimpia, jos ajatellaan kansallista menestystä ja hyvinvointia. Voimapolitiikkaa!
Ministereiksi saatiin sitten taitajia, joiden mielessä naisten palauttaminen hellaruotuun, ruotsin kielen opiskelun vaikeuttaminen ja Karjalan palauttaminen ovat tehtävistä tärkeimpiä ja joitakuita, joilla asioiden hallitseminen ja julkinen esiintyminen ovat vieneet paljon energiaa, mutta koska hallituksella ei oikeastaan ole muuta tekemistä ollut, kuin soten rustaaminen, niin siihen on ollut varaa.
Olihan se selvää, että vihapuhe puolueen käyttövoimana johtaa myös puolueen sisällä vihapuheeseen, riitaisuuteen ja kyvyttömyyteen hoitaa yhteisiä asioita. Mutta se on myös miehekästä!
Keväällä 2017 Suomessa olikin sitten jännittävä tilanne, kun hallituspuolue Perussuomalaiset rp. hajosi vihaansa. Hallitukseen ei ollut demokraattisella tavalla löydettävissä osaavia ministereitä eduskuntapuolueista. Kaikeksi onneksi ministerit Sipilä ja Orpo keksivät uuden vaihtoehdon: ainahan on mahdollista pestata puolueiden ulkopuolelta henkilöitä, joilla on oman hallintoalansa suurin osaaminen, lahjakkuus ja edustavuus.
Googlaamalla löydettiin tuoreet ja raikkaat ministerit, joista naisellisinkin osaa sentään humaltua kunnolla tanssimatta pöydillä.

We don’t see things as they are, we see things as we are.
Anaïs Niin (1907-77)
The Islamophobic Perussuomalaiset (PS)* is a shrinking single-issue political party that wants, but cannot succeed, at turning Finland into a Denmark-style country where political parties try to outdo each other in their racism and bigotry.
With parliamentary elections just ten months away in April 2019, it is clear that the PS is doing everything possible to attract attention with their political antics. Contrary to the 2011 parliamentary elections, when the number of their MPs rose to 39 from 5 in the previous election, those years are long gone.
According to some polls, the PS is going to be one of the biggest losers of the 2019 parliamentary elections.
While this may be the case, the PS will launch repeated attacks and spread lies about migrants and minorities.
One of these involves closing our borders to asylum seekers, especially to those who cannot read or write.
One PS city councilman from Mikkeli contended in a blog post, which was full of grammatical errors that 46% of all sexual crimes against under-18-year-old teenagers are by asylum seekers.
The claim, which the councilperson bases on a Police University College report, forgets to mention that 46% figure he uses is from a sample of 147 cases or a total of 68 cases. In 2015, 32,477 asylum seekers came to Finland. If we just look at that year, 147 cases out of 32,477 asylum seekers total 0.45%.
Getting one’s facts wrong and grossly exaggerating them is nothing new for the PS.
Another recent claim by the PS is that in 30 years Finland will have cities where white people will be minorities.

The claim, that white Finns will become a minority in the face of migrants and minorities, is one of the oldest tricks in the books by anti-immigration parties.
Tälle tapauksella oli hyvä loppu: Sailön otettu 20.2.2018 ja vapautettu Joutsenon säilöönottoyksiköstä 17.5.2018 melkein neljä kuukauden jälkeen. Kaikki joka ovat olleet Joutsenon säilöönottoyksikkössä ovat samaa mieltä yhdestä asiasta: Se on kauhea paikka ja peilikuva siitä mitä meidän yhteiskunta ei pitäisi olla.
Säilöönotto päättyi menestyksekkääseen Lex Gaudiuksen kanteluun Itä-Suomen hovioikeuteen.
____________________________________________





Lue alkuperänen Facebook juttu tästä.
Postaus julkaistu luvalla.
Migrant Tales has exposed how an Espoo-Helsinki-based food distributor allegedly pays asylum seekers under the table. The company’s name, which the authorities know, allegedly threatens asylum seekers to do their dirty work, like change the sell-by date of its products.
The company in question allegedly told one of these asylum seekers that it had employed that it would report the person to the police if it did not change the expired sell-by date of its products.
The asylum seekers had two rejections for asylum and deportation proceedings were hanging over his head.



This story below by Helsingin Sanomat, Finland’s largest daily, is a typical example of how the media portray migrants and minorities in this country: There must be a picture of a Somali woman because it is about migrants, and not one member of the non-white Finnish community is interviewed.
While the story gives superficial reasons why white Finns are so strict about whom they accept as Finns, the reporter should have dug deeper and ask how we ended up becoming a racialized society.
You will not have to search far because the answer is in our recent history. Even at elementary schools in the 1970s, children were taught that n stood for the n-word. While eugenics was relegated into the dustbin of history after World War 2, history books in Finland fifty years ago claimed that we were made up of two races: the Nordic and Eastern Baltic.

In 2015, Migrant Tales published a series of stories highlighting the Finnish media’s deficient and opinionated reporting about migrants and minorities.
We will begin to publish more of these types of stories from June.

Below are some of the things to watch for when looking at the Finnish media’s bias when reporting on migration and minorities:
Plan Finland’s failed campaign against unwanted pregnancies in Africa is an example of a broader, more serious problem: white exceptionalism. In looking at the campaign by Plan Finland, one can only wonder what these people thought when they launched it.
To grasp the full extent of the problem and how disrespectful the campaign is, what would white Finns think if blacks from Africa launched a campaign with white Finnish pregnant twelve-year-olds wearing suggestively African clothes?
Newspapers and blogs in Zambia and elsewhere have picked up the story.
Writes Mainstream Humanitarian:
“Later, they found a 12-year-old pregnant Zambian child, (Whose name we can not disclouse due to media ethics protecting children), made her wear the clothes and had a Finnish photographer; Meeri Koutaniemi take her pictures. Subsequently, they produced romanticized pictures of child pregnancy, which was stated by the designer herself in a video, and made her pose in a sexually suggestive way in the name of fashion photography. The girl and her family did not receive any form of compensation.”
Indeed, such a campaign would never happen in Europe and Finland because black Africans do not have such power and privilege over white Europeans, who still support their colonial privilege as white saviors.

Dr. Faith Mkwesha, who is the founder and executive director of Sahwira Africa International (SahWira Africa International), an anon-government organization that organizes cultural activities and consultancy on African culture and development issues, is one of Plan Finland campaign’s most outspoken critics.
“I think our campaign has exposed the racism in the campaign and the white savior complex,” she said. “The white savior is the idea that white people are better, progressive and exceptional and [that] black people and people of Africa or Asia etc are uncivilized and barbaric and need white people to save them from their ignorance.”
According to Dr. Mkwesha, it is precisely this type of white-savior mentality that gave European colonial powers the justification to enslave and pillage whole continents and regions.
“It [the white savior mentaility] is maintained because white people build their identity in relation to others,” she continued. “So now, when they do charity [work], they feel they are better and keep in place white superiority. That is why they use people in distress to appeal to their emotions.”
A report commissioned by the Finnish ministry of the interior revealed that migrants are 2.5 times more likely than white Finns to be assaulted, reports YLE News.
Another study published in 2014 by the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), showed that first-generation immigrants at school are more likely to experience bullying, physical threats and sexual harassment than white Finns.
Even if violence and harassment of migrants are too common in Finland, the report published by the ministry of the interior claims that “very little is known about the relative security of different groups in society.” In its survey, THL admitted in their study that there has been up to know very little information about this groups of minors who have foreign-born parents.
While it is a good matter that Finland wakes up to the ogre of racism and the violence it sows in society, that the results of these studies “surprise” officials reveal, in my opinion, a heavy dose of denial and the unwillingness to do anything effective to challenge the problem. White privilege must numb and discourage them to act effectively.

While Finnish privilege not only permits you to keep your social entitlements, it guards you better from violence unless you are a woman.
Continue reading “Exposing white Finnish privilege #52: Having no privilege is dangerous”
What policies – if any – does Denmark apply to create an inclusive and culturally diverse (non-white society)? Ban, tar and feather these women in public is the answer.
The only good thing I can say about the country is that the Perussuomalaiset party’s [1] bid to turn Finland into an Islamophobic and racist nation like Denmark failed. Small consolation to an overbearing social ill facing us today.

* The media mixes up niqab with burka, a garment worn by women that covers their body and the face. When some media speaks of the niqab, a dress that covers the woman’s body except for the eyes, they call it wrongly burka.
[1] After the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party imploded on June 13 into two factions, the PS and New Alternative, which is now called Blue Reform. Despite the name changes, we believe that it is the same party in different clothing. Both factions are hostile to cultural diversity. One is more open about it while the other is more diplomatic.
A direct translation of Perussuomalaiset in English would be something like “basic” or “fundamental Finn.” Official translations of the Finnish name of the party, such as Finns Party or True Finns, promote in our opinion nativist nationalism and racism. We, therefore, at Migrant Tales prefer to use in our postings the Finnish name of the party once and after that the acronym PS.