Standing together with four other Nordic prime ministers, Juha Sipilä states that Finland isn’t a racist country, according to YLE in English. I’m a bit baffled by Sipilä’s statement. What does Finland “not being a racist country” actually mean?
Is he saying that racism doesn’t exist? Does his claim mean that it’s under control? Does it mean that we have racism and the prime minister is ashamed by it?
Or is it denial that such a social ill is one of the biggest challenges we have as our society becomes ever-culturally diverse?
We don’t know because the statement doesn’t give us too many clues.
Sipilä also claimed at the press conference that all of the Nordic countries “are international, open and tolerant.”
Taking into account recent election results in Denmark and Finland, one could debate the prime minister’s claim.
The only prime minister at the press conference that could be considered “international, open and tolerant” is Stefan Lofven of Sweden. Norway, Denmark and Finland all have populist and anti-cultural diversity parties that could be described as “xenophobic, closed and intolerant.”
Who are they? The Perussuomalaiset (PS)* of Finland, the Danish People’s Party and the Progress Party of Norway.
All three of these parties base their political support on anti-cultural diversity sentiment, excluding and victimizing migrants and minorities and encouraging that they be kept on short leashes.
Read full story here.
Why have we seen in recent years the rise of populist parties in the Nordic region that are xenophobic and hostile to cultural diversity if we “are open, international and tolerant?”








