Month: June 2011

Leave my multicultural Finnish identity alone!

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Many of the arguments used by the anti-immigration camp in this country is based on myths from nineteenth century Finnish history. When these groups declare war on multiculturalism what they are revealing is their denial of our cultural diversity as a nation.

When a person or group openly oppose multiculturalism in Finland they’ll never tell you how they plan to make Finland ethnically homogeneous.

Certainly Nazi Germany’s ethnic policies are one horrific reminder of what happened when racial homogeneity became an aim of state policy. Never in the history of humankind have we seen such systematic mass murder on such a grand scale as during Nazi Germany. Not even Stalin’s purges or Pol Pot regime’s killing fields come close.

But let’s ask the following question to those that deny Finland’s cultural diversity:  How can we be “ethnically and culturally homogeneous” if our country was part of Sweden and under Russian rule for six hundred years? How about the over one million Finns that left this country as immigrants in the past 150 years?

Some of these so-called critics who are vehemently against immigration and cultural diversity make it sound as if Finns evolved separately from other groups. There was no genetic and cultural mixing with anyone, period.

These types of arguments, used by parties like Persussuomalaiset (PS) MPs like Jussi Halla-aho, are based on myths that are deeply rooted in nineteenth century Finnish national identity. Instead of celebrating and encouraging  our diversity as Finns after 1917, we erased it in order to build a national identity.

While nationalism was one important cultural eraser that encouraged Finns, for example, to change their surnames after independence and hide and even be ashamed of their cultural  diversity, it has become today one of the biggest obstacles in accepting immigrants and multicultural Finns.

Groups like Suomalaisuuden Liitto have through the PS declared open war against our Swedish-speaking minority.

New Finns is in many respects a deceptive label because we are not speaking of “new” Finns per se but in some cases quite old ones whom we have forgotten or erased from our collective memory. Jews and Russians are just a few to begin with.

Ever wonder why a Nazi-spirited association like Suomen Sisu or its members like Halla-aho don’t openly condemn the works of David Duke? It is because this former Klu Klux Klan member is an enemy of multiculturalism, or cultural diversity.

The video below on an interview with Duke exposes Suomen Sisu’s mindset in a Finnish context. In a recent television program Halla-aho refused to condemn the works of Duke and Alfred Rosenberg, a former Nazi pseudo-philosopher who defended ethnic homogeneity as a state virtue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd69pe_cL08&feature=related

My message to anyone who messes with my multicultural Finnish background is simple, loud and clear: Leave it alone and learn to accept it. If you don’t, that is your problem.

Suomen Kuvalehti.fi: Aziz Sheikhani: Maahanmuuttajat tarvitsevat oman puolueen

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Azis Shekhani poses an interesting question that has crossed the minds of many in Finland: Should immigrants establish their own political party?

Shekhani argues that since immigrants have not succeeded at getting MPs elected on the ticket of traditional political parties and have taken part in the political process in good faith, a good way to change matters would be to form a political party made up immigrants and Finns.

With the municipal elections taking place next year, one way of running for office would be without the backing of any political party. It could be a good way to protest against the present situation and the hostile climate.

What do you think?

__________

Azis Shekhani

Maahanmuuttajat ovat osa suomalaista yhteiskuntaa. Heidän määränsä on kasvamassa, toinen sukupolvi on varttumassa. Heidän tulevaisuutensa ja paikkansa suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa on kiinni kantaväestön asenteesta ja antamista mahdollisuuksista. Valitettavasti maahanmuuttajia on laman ja vaalien aikana arvosteltu, ja median ja puolueiden mielipiteet Suomeen muuttaneista eivät ole olleet myönteisiä.

Read whole story.

The New York Review of Books: A New Approach to the Holocaust

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: The New York Review of Books  offers some of the best analysis around on history and contemporary affairs. If you are going to subscribe to this excellent journal, you have to set aside a lot of time to read the lengthy and well-written reviews.

The Holocaust will always live by us like an ugly reminder of our savagery, or in particular of a regime that based its existence on racism and ethnic homogeneity. Some have asked on Migrant Tales what does the adjective “Nazi-spirited” mean before an association like Suomen Sisu? The answer is in its racial views and, like the Nazis, to the idea that ethnic homogeneity is an important value that society should strive to maintain.

This idea is not only shared openly by PS MPs like Jussi Halla-aho who are emembers of Suomen Sisu, but by many far-right populist parties in Europe like the Sweden Democrats and others. In other words, their reason for being and aim is based on their objection to multiculturalism, or cultural diversity, which is a threat to  ethnic homogeneity. 

One matter that these parties and associations don’t tell you is how they plan to preserve never mind return their countries back to some “ethnically homogeneous” society. Taking into account that over a million Finns emigrated from here in the last 150 years and that Finland has always been a part of Europe, we can even argue if we’ve ever been ethnically homogeneous. 

Ethnic homogeneity as an ideal of society has its roots in racism and most recently to the rise of fascism in the 1930s.

This explains as well why PS MPs like Halla-aho and Suomen Sisu don’t openly condemn the works of Alfred Rosenberg and David Duke. Halla-aho even plays down the Nuremberg Trials.  “It is quite justifiable to see the Nuremberg trials as a farce,” he wrote. “Sure, the guilty had been condemned in advance and their convictions carried out on absurd grounds.”

Peter Longereich’s Holocaust not only tells us how misguided Nazi Germany was concerning their pathological ethnic policies but how it led to mass murder when they tried to implement them and make their country and occupied territories ethnically homogeneous. If the Nazi ideology failed in this task and caused as a result the systematic murder and social engineering through death camps and deportation of millions of Europeans, it is doubtful that far-right parties will ever succeed in the task today.

Do you agree?

__________

It is fruitless to reduce the manifold evil of the Holocaust to a single cause. Ideology, charisma, conformism, hatred, greed, and war were all very important, but each was related to the others and all mattered within rapidly changing historical circumstances. In his profound study Holocaust, Peter Longerich puts forward an analysis that includes all these factors and shows how politics or, as he puts it, Politik, set them all in motion. In this amplified English edition of his Politik der Vernichtung (1998), Longerich preserves the German term Judenpolitik, and with good reason. In German Politik means both “politics” and “policy,” and the compound noun (Juden + Politik) gives a sense of a joining of concepts that English cannot quite convey.

Read whole story.

Aikalainen: Tyhmää kansaa valistetaan

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: One of the most interesting matters that media culture Professor Mikko Lehtonen states in the Tampere University publication, Aikalainen, is that the rise of the Perussuomalaiset (PS) was helped by the traditional parties that didn’t look down on some aspects of their campaign message.  

“If for example the Social Democrats would not have started to clearly go in that direction but would have stated that we have certain constitutional values and a certain welfare state tradition, it could have challenged this (PS) phenomenon,” said Lehtonen.  “I think the old political elite could take a look at itself in the mirror.”

Lehtonen is correct in stating that by not challenging strongly enough the rise of the PS, the traditional parties fuelled it with their lack of counterarguments and silence. This can be seen as well in the Finnish media that appeared in many cases like its US counterpart before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  Only a few publications, like The New York Review of Books, questioned the US-led invasion.

Even though Lehtonen doesn’t state what aspect of the PS message appealed to the traditional parties, we could make a case that one of these was their anti-immigration and anti-Islam stance.  Did the PS awaken their xenophobia and ignorance of immigration and refugee issues?

Another point that Lehtonen makes is about the core PS voter, who is a 20-35 year old man with little education.

“Rarely are the PS supporters spoken of in a positive fashion by the media,” Lehtonen says. “They are always something else and always a problem. In this respect they remind us a lot of how immigrants are spoken of (in public).”

Do you agree?

________________

Heikki Laurinolli

Mediakulttuurin professori löytää persujen suosiosta vasemmiston heikkoutta ja identiteettipolitiikan nousua. Perussuomalaisten nousun syynä on vasemmiston heikkous ja kyvyttömyys miettiä identiteettipolitiikan kannalta esimerkiksi maahanmuuttoa. Näin arvioi Tampereen yliopiston mediakulttuurin professori Mikko Lehtonen kevään eduskuntavaalitulosta.

Read whole story.

The dark side of Finland that has me concerned

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

When historians look at this period and study how the ogre of racism got such a big foothold in Finland, they will probably conclude that it was always there but found one of its homes in the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party. When they point out how some Finns tried to make xenophobia and racism a “normal” matter in Finland, a long list of PS politicians will emerge.

The most startling fact these researchers will stumble upon is that the role of racism got a more public face thanks to the paralysis that struck the country’s main politicians and the media, which is today starting to be more outspoken against this social ill.

This kind of country, which has its values in the right place but has taken for granted a threat like racism, is what scares me. It shows how easily we can lose our society to extremists. All you need is to feed spite, find the right scapegoats and spread myths and exaggerated rhetoric.

That is why we not only need to defend our civil rights every day but distinguish those who are dressed in sheep’s clothing and who want to destroy them.

Parties like the PS have no place ruling Finland as long as they do not even respect the will of the majority. By the majority we mean the overwhelming  majority (80.9%) who didn’t vote for the PS or side with their anti-EU policies and populist style of politics.

The fact that the PS didn’t even want to take part in the formation of the next government is a good example of how Timo Soini’s party is more talk than action.

Holding a whole country hostage to Soini’s anti-EU policies should outrage Finns as well as many other aspects of the PS.

Helsingin Yliopisto: Populismin juuret ovat kaukana historiassa

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment: Inari Sakki of the University of Helsinki, who was one of 16 new  academy research fellows on the Research Council for Culture and Society, has focused her research on current support of the far right in Europe and Finland. 

Sakki states that it is important to study those factors give far-right parties their support. While the Sweden Democrats reject Islam and multiculturalism and want to return to a Sweden of the 1950s when there were few if any immigrants, the rhetoric of the Perussuomalaiset is based on values like nationalism.

The PS  have not only shown to be unfit to govern, but are keeping the whole country and the political establishment hostage of their anti-EU stance.  Is their anything “patriotic” about this stance or is it just another opportunistic ploy to score political brownie points with other euroskeptic parties in Europe?

The reluctance to take part in government is also an indication that the PS doesn’t have the experience to sit on government. It could reveal the PS is a lot of talk and little action.  

Do you agree?

______________

“On selvää, että äärioikeiston kannatuksen kasvu on yleiseurooppalainen ilmiö”, sanoo Suomen Akatemian tuore tutkijatohtori Inari Sakki. Monien muiden Euroopan maiden tavoin populistipuolueet ovat moninkertaistaneet kannatuksensa viime vuoden aikana myös Suomessa ja Ruotsissa. Vaikka ilmiö on näkyvä, Inari Sakin mielestä uutta tietoa aiheeseen tuo sosiaalipsykologinen näkökulma.

Read whole story.

PS’ recipe for failure: nationalism, xenophobia and isolationism

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

It is pretty incredible how a minority like the Perussuomalaiset (PS) that got 19.1% of the votes are blackmailing the rest of the country with their anti-EU policies. It not only wants the majority to join its anti-EU bandwagon, but has among its ranks MPs like Jussi Halla-aho, who are trying to  give bigotry a respectable name in Finland. 

But can any sensible person in this country play down what the PS hope to achieve politically? One of the main stands of  Timo Soini and the PS is Finland’s withdrawal from the European Union and slap more restrictions on immigration.

Has the EU impacted Finland negatively? Have the 2.9% immigrants living in this country formed a threat to our way of life? Why all this obnoxious nationalism? What gives?

If I had the opportunity to interview Soini, one of the questions I’d ask him is how Finland is going to succeed outside the EU? Of course he’ll never give me a satisfactory answer because he is a politicians. Politicians rarely reveal all their playing cards.

Here is one PS politician who likes to bash immigrants on the net, city councilor  Hemmo Koskiniemi of Rovaniemi, on how the PS will give Finland back to the Finns.  This is what he writes in Uusi Suomi. Scary stuff.

While Soini and the PS may look like foxes  in sheep’s clothing, another menace to Finland is Halla-aho and his Suomen Sisu followers.

Here is a good link (in Finnish) of the provocative statements he’s made throughout the years about immigrants. One of the many that ring out was in 2007 when he wrote that, “I am against immigration and I hope a growing number of Finns are against it.”

The fascination of some Finns with Halla-aho and Soini, who opportunistically uses him to lure votes to his party, is a good example of how low politics has stooped in Finland.

Taking into account the problems the PS has already inflicted on Finland through its populism, anti-immigration and anti-EU rhetoric, you don’t need to be an expert to grasp that Finland is on a perilous path.

The PS view of the future of Finland hinges on nationalism, xenophobia and isolationism. In plain English it means recipe for failure.


A PS city councilman’s “justified” racism

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Perussuomalaiset Rovaniemi city councilman Hemmo Koskimies is a good example of how some politician have lost touch with  fairness and become the leaders of social-media lynch mobs. In a blog entry headlined, “Justified racism – an ‘n-word’ lives alone in a 75 m2 home,” is an example of how low a PS politician can stoop to promote hatred.

Migrant Tales got in touch with the editor-in-chief  Markku Huusko and later on with producer, Jarmo Koponen, about Koskimies’ claims. A well-respected publication would ask the blogger to put out a correction.

I phoned the City of Rovaniemi as well to verify Koskimies’ claim that an immigrant was abusing the system. The answer I got from a city official strongly suggests that Koskiniemi took the lazy route by not verifying his facts meticulously.

Racism has not only spread in Finland thanks to people like Koskimies’ blog entries but with the silence and inaction of the Finnish media. Their passivity has given racism an ever-greater foothold in Finnish society.

Every one has the right to express himself. Even so, one does not have the right to spread misinformation. When this happens, the publication and journalist have the responsiblity of putting out a correction.

I recommend the following procedure if you read a blog or story that is similar to what Koskimieni wrote: (1) Get in touch with the source and find out if what the writer is claiming is true; (2) write or phone the editor or news editor and point out the mistake or wrongful claim; and (3) if the publication does nothing, get in touch directly with the Council for Mass Media in Finland (JSN).

Unfortunately, the PS’ victory in April has given some politicians the mistaken notion that it is now perfectly ok to insult and spread misinformation against immigrants.

The contempt for the Finnish media of some PS politicians like Jussi Halla-aho reveals how distant their values are to two crucial pillars of the real journalist and writer: ethics and fairness.

With a little bit of our own investigative reporting we can challenge some of the malarkey being published on immigrants and refugees in this country.


Iltalehti: Tutkijat: Rasistiset teot kumpuavat myös politiikasta

Posted on by Migrant Tales

Comment:  Tabloid Iltalehti spoke to two researchers who believe that the present anti-immigration climate in Finland and the Perussuomalaiset (PS) victory on April 17 has lowered the bar for racist acts, according to sociologist Anna Rastas. “The general atmosphere is more permissive of this type (racist) behavior,” she said.

Researcher Teivo Teivanen believes that the election result made anti-immigration more acceptable.

Looking at the recent hate crimes reported by the media and on Migrant Tales, it’s not that difficult to figure out there is a connection between the rise of racism in Finland  all the way up to the election.

The election result has emboldened racists to come out of the closet.  Such people think it is now ok to go around harassing and attacking immigrants in public. 

The situation Finland is today one of the worst in its history for immigrants and minorities. 

Can the situation escalate further? Sure it can. 

Who is then responsible? The assailant of the hate crime or the politician that fill his head with hatred and  fuelled his racism?

_____________

STT

Tutkijoiden mielestä poliittisen kentän uudet tuulet ovat vaikuttaneet ihmisten asenteisiin maahanmuuttajia kohtaan. STT:n haastattelemat rasismin ja politiikan tutkijat näkevät yhteyden, jota on eduskuntavaalien jälkeen spekuloitu kahvipöytäkeskusteluissa ympäri maan.

Read whole story.

Ten fallacies of the PS’ anti-immigration arguments

Posted on by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

When I was a kid growing up in California we used to say phony baloney when a fellow classmate exaggerated or lied. If we look at the Perussuomalaiset (PS) party’s mindset and claims on immigration, I would certainly be one of the first to let out a vociferous cry: “Phony baloney!”

Here are ten common phony why-we-should-not-trust-the-anti-immigrant arguments by the PS:

1. The people voted for us because they want tighter immigration laws.

Counterargument: Eighty-one percent of Finns voted for traditional parties. Anti-immigration PS candidates like Jussi Halla-aho and others got a fraction of the total votes. When the PS states that it is the “will of the voters” to punish immigrants they are really pushing it. A minority (19.1%) voted for them. They speak, however, as if the majority of Finns have the same opinions as the PS.

2. Tighter immigration laws will solve the problem.

Counterargument: Talk of tighter immigration laws is a red herring used by the PS to hide their contempt for groups like the Somalis. When they bash one group it ends up spilling over on all the rest of us. It poisons the air.  Tightening family reunification rules are one underhanded attempt to make life as difficult as possible for certain immigrant groups living in Finland. A 150 years ago when Finns emigrated to the United States, they brought their families and friends. Building social networks is vital for immigrants.

3. Our integration program is a failure.

Counterargument: Is it a failure or do too few have access to Finnish-language courses? A Mipex survey (www.mipex.eu) showed that Finland’s integration program was the fourth best after Sweden, Portugal and Canada. Anti-immigration groups are unimaginative. They use the same arguments in every country they churn public opinion. Some of their favorite adjectives before the word immigrant or immigration include: uncontrolled, mass, unadapted, illiterate, barbaric etc.  They are, however, making the following argument: Since this group of people are so different from us they can never live in our country. Our hatred and racism is therefore justified.

4. Islam is a religion of violence.

Counterargument: As mentioned, anti-immigration groups are intellectually lazy. One of the things they like to do is over-generalize about groups. Even though they claim that they have individuality and freewill, people from other groups supposedly don’t, according to them. They just walk around and receive orders from their culture like zombies. They even stay that way for generations!

5. I can insult any ethnic group I please. I would never speak this way to my people. I am exercising my right to freedom of speech.

Counterargument: Since when was insulting and acting rudely exemplary behavior never mind protecting freedom of speech? Anti-immigration groups hide their racism with this argument. What they are not telling you is that if they were ever in power, they’d be the first ones to silence you by force or with the help of social- media lynch mobs that roam the net today.

6. We are against multiculturalism.

Counterargument: What does multiculturalism mean to the PS? Does it mean that they are against our cultural diversity? If they are what do they plan to replace it with? All you hear is whining but no concrete proposals. Why? Because they have none to offer or because their proposal(s) if ever known to the public would frighten sensible people.

7. We must stop the growth of cultural diversity. There is no racism in Finland.

Counterargument: Here is the mother of all arguments used by some anti-immigration MPs like Jussi Halla-aho. They are not only denying who we are but encouraging hostility towards people who are immigrants or multicultural Finns. They read people like Alfred Rosenberg and David Duke because they are the antithesis of cultural diversity.  Since Finland isn’t culturally diverse there can’t be any racism, right?

8. We are not racists!

Counterargument: Just like anti-immigration groups don’t recognize that Finland is already culturally diverse, they similarly deny that they are racists. Behind their destructive ideology you will find a person who is challenged on many fronts, especially living in a culturally diverse society.

9. Racism is patriotism.

Counterargument: Racism and insulting behavior towards immigrants and minorities has nothing to do with patriotism never mind showing our respect to our fallen veterans. Their racism, which is dressed up with the help of quaint words and arguments, is nothing more than nationalism. For some, patriotism means a sense of community and acceptance. Nationalism, on the other hand, is a hostile ethnocentric view of the world.

10. We are natives and immigrants the colonizers.

Counterargument: Believe it or not, this is one argument used by some Finns in 2011 Finland. What they don’t know is that every time they speak of themselves as a tribe they are flirting with racism. Finns are not a tribe!