Migrant tales
Menu
  • #MakeRacismHistory “In Your Eyes”
  • About Migrant Tales
  • It’s all about Human Rights
  • Literary
  • Migrant Tales Media Monitoring
  • NoHateFinland.org
  • Tales from Europe
Menu

Finland and the far-right threat posed by Halla-aho and Niinistö

Posted on January 16, 2012 by Migrant Tales

By Enrique Tessieri

Social Democrat Party presidential hopeful, Paavo Lipponen, has been the most outspoken candidate about the threat of the far right in Finland. On a television debate Thursday, he accused Perussuomalaiset (PS) party far-right MPs like Jussi Halla-aho and Jussi Niinistö of hiding behind Timo Soini of boosting the PS leader’s as well as the party’s popularity.  

Setting aside his Islamophobic rhetoric, Halla-aho suggested recently that the Greek military should overthrow the elected government. Contrarily Niinistö  is on another crusade to weaken the role of the Swedish-speaking minority in this country.

Niinstö’s far-right credentials come from his association with Suomalaisuuden liitto (Association of Finnish Culture), where he is a board member. Suomalaisuuden liitto is an association that was founded in 1906 but is today firmly under the control of the PS. One of its board members is Teemu Lahtinen, a PS member who belongs to IKL, a fascist party founded in the early 1930s.

Believe it or not, both Halla-aho and Niinstö chair the all-important administrative and defense committee of parliament.

Below is a joint campaign ad for the April 17 election by Halla-aho and Lahtinen. The Hindi turban used on the potato shows the extent of their ignorance. I apologize for the racist nature of the video clip.

It would be naive, even reckless, to think that the PS in general and some of its members in particular are not flirting and promoting far-right ideology.

Niinstö’s political colors became evident on September 12, when he stated in parliament Nazi playwright Hans Johst’s Schlageter, “Wenn ich Kultur höre … entsichere ich meinen Browning” (“Whenever I hear of culture… I release the safety-catch of my Browning”). 

Niinstö substituted the word “culture” in Johst’s play for parliamentarism.

Certainly Niinstö never mind Soini will never admit they are promoting far-right nationalism at the cost of minorities and our noble Nordic social welfare democracy.  If you ask them, they will tell you with a poker face that they are fighting for your rights. Nothing could be further from the truth.

There is one quote by Adolf Hitler and another one by Hermann Göring that help shed light on the sad state of Finland and Europe today. The first one by Hitler is how far-right groups spread urban myths about immigrants and minorities today: Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.

The second one by Göring shows how the far right lures new followers:  The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.

Category: All categories, Enrique

28 thoughts on “Finland and the far-right threat posed by Halla-aho and Niinistö”

  1. justicedemon says:
    January 16, 2012 at 8:26 am

    Perhaps Klay will explain what the crowd is chanting at the beginning of that Halla-Aho video clip.

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      January 16, 2012 at 9:00 am

      –Perhaps Klay will explain what the crowd is chanting at the beginning of that Halla-Aho video clip.

      I think it would be a good idea, JusticeDemon.

      Reply
  2. kati says:
    January 16, 2012 at 10:54 am

    I can’t believe that’s actually real. How utterly ridiculous and sad. I’m still trying to decide on the best presidential candidate…

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      January 16, 2012 at 3:42 pm

      Hi Kati, welcome to Migrant Tales! Es un gusto verte por acá también.

      Reply
  3. Addi says:
    January 16, 2012 at 2:50 pm

    How sad and disgraceful these politicians and their followers who subscribe to such beliefs are to Finland. Unfortunately, I am not unfamiliar with Jussi Halla-aho. In fact, one of my mother’s distant cousins, Jussi Sippola, was the judge in the Helsinki district court who ruled that Halla-aho acted with the intention to blaspheme and imposed a fine on him back in either 2009 or 2010, I believe it was.
    Anyway, here in the U.S. today is Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, a federal holiday. I’m reminded of part of a speech that our president gave back in 2008 before he was elected president. It is still relevant today.:
    ” ‘Unity is the great need of the hour’ is what King said. Unity is how we shall overcome. Unity is the great need of the hour – the great need of this hour. Not because it sounds pleasant or because it makes us feel good, but because it’s the only way we can overcome the essential deficit that exists in this country [America].
    I’m not talking about a budget deficit. I’m not talking about a trade deficit. I’m not talking about a deficit of good ideas or new plans.
    I’m talking about a moral deficit. I’m talking about an empathy deficit. I’m taking about an inability to recognize ourselves in one another; to understand that we are our brother’s keeper; we are our sister’s keeper; that, in the words of Dr. King, we are all tied together in a single garment of destiny.” ~ Senator Barack Obama, 1/21/2008

    January 12 at 1:52am · Like

    Reply
  4. Allan says:
    January 16, 2012 at 3:36 pm

    In the USA Halla-aho would not have been sentenced, as there is a thing called “freedom of speech”. The whole clause of “blasphemy” is outdated, if there is a God, then that God can deal the punishment by throwing thunderbolts.

    The only thing discraceful is not the sad cohort of remnants of the 70’s communist movement writing this kind of libelous articles, but someone actually believeing them. Halla-aho’s comment of Greece was related to the inability of the government to make decisions that will make them loose support. Which the next week saw a cabinet crisis. A little piquant detail is that Greece is buying 400 leopard tanks, a few submarines and fighter jets with its bailout money.

    What comes to Niinisto’s comment on “parliamentarism”, that was directed against taking the decision power away from the people to political party elite, but you sad communists never believed in democracy, as long as your party was ruling.

    Reply
  5. justicedemon says:
    January 16, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    Allan

    I don’t think there are any regular contributors to this blog who are Communists. Are you sure you posted your message in the right place?

    As for freedom of speech in the USA, Allan, I suggest you go to a crowded Broadway theatre and shout bomb! as loud as you can. You will probably end up in Gitmo, where you can while away the hours, days and years thinking about your rights.

    Reply
  6. Allan says:
    January 16, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    And justicedemon, how does crying a bomb in broadway got anything to do about describing what a man in his 40’s having sex with a 9-year old is?

    Reply
  7. Roger Roger says:
    January 16, 2012 at 5:07 pm

    Hi Justicedemon,

    need some legal advise in case of discrimination at work, If you could help me in this matter then please do send me an email message at [email protected] and I shall reply with my matters.

    sorry Enrique for unusual comment on this post, I was looking for Justicedemon all over the place, so, found just here. You can delete my comment later, as I am hopeful he’ll contact me !!!

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      January 16, 2012 at 5:23 pm

      Hi Roger Roger, no problem. We’re happy that you found JusticeDemon. I am certain he’ll get in touch with you.

      Reply
  8. Allan says:
    January 16, 2012 at 5:28 pm

    “Are you sure you posted your message in the right place?”
    Just as a warning for English-speaking people, as the Finnish speakers can read all this off SAFKA already. Another quality site on Finnish politics!

    Reply
  9. justicedemon says:
    January 16, 2012 at 6:28 pm

    Allan

    1) So tell us: who are these Communists? Go on – give us another laugh.

    2) You are either talking about Jouko Petri Jaatinen or you are unbelievably ignorant of historical context. I don’t think Richard II was in breach of Canon Law, but I might be wrong about that.

    3) I doubt that most Finnish speakers can make much sense of the SIF website, even if they completed their B3 course in Russian at Senior High School.

    Reply
  10. Addi says:
    January 16, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    I actually find it very unfortunate that hate speech is considered free speech here in the U.S.. Words are powerful and can influence and/or motivate others to act out in a violent manner. When someone verbally provides the supposed argument and/or “justification” for violence, then the only thing missing is the gun or the bomb. The people who engage in hate speech know exactly what they’re doing, and they just sit back and wait for some lunatic to act on their hateful, violent words.

    In January of 2010, the Supreme Court Of The United States ruled that placing limits on independent spending by corporations for political purposes is somehow a violation of their 1st Amendment right to free speech. So, corporations in the U.S. have been granted the same right to free speech that human beings living in the U.S. have, and they can now purchase elections. Should free speech = unlimited political donations too?? Uh, no…that’s just wrong. Just because it’s “legal” doesn’t make it right or moral!

    Reply
    1. Enrique says:
      January 16, 2012 at 9:12 pm

      –In January of 2010, the Supreme Court Of The United States ruled that placing limits on independent spending by corporations for political purposes is somehow a violation of their 1st Amendment right to free speech.

      That is unfortunate. Is that what they call leveling out the playing field?

      Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Dwight Eisenhower, both Republicans, warned us about the role of big business and the industrial-military complex in destroying a country. Here is the link: http://wp.me/p4UBR-22s if you are interested.

      Reply
  11. Addi says:
    January 16, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    “That is unfortunate. Is that what they call leveling out the playing field?”

    Heh…in reality, of course, this ruling serves to tilt the playing field even MORE in favor of the corporations and big banks. It basically redefines corporations as people and assigns rights to them that, prior to the ruling, were only constitutionally guaranteed to human beings. It was both a sad and totally absurd day for democracy in America. In fact, President Barack Obama took the unprecedented step of calling out the justices of The Supreme Court of The United States during his 2010 State of The Union Address just a couple of weeks after the court handed down this ruling.
    “President Barack Obama stated that the decision ‘gives the special interests and their lobbyists even more power in Washington — while undermining the influence of average Americans who make small contributions to support their preferred candidates’.[41] Obama later elaborated in his weekly radio address saying, ‘this ruling strikes at our democracy itself’ and ‘I can’t think of anything more devastating to the public interest’.[42] On January 27, 2010, Obama further condemned the decision during the 2010 State of the Union Address, stating that, ‘Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law[43] to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities.'”
    Now here’s the leading Republican candidate for president in our 2012 presidential elections telling a group of people that corporations ARE people. It’s so insane. http://youtu.be/KlPQkd_AA6c

    Thanks for the link, Enrique. What’s even more sad is that in this day and age today’s Republicans would think that Lincoln and Eisenhower were left wing extremists/socialists. Even Ronald Reagan would be too liberal for America’s far right extremist Republicans. We no longer have “moderate” Republicans. Hahaha, unless you count President Barack Obama.

    Reply
  12. justicedemon says:
    January 16, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    That’s largely a debate about semantics. In law a person is simply anything that can be the bearer of rights. Corporations are also persons in law, and may hold rights (patents are an obvious example) that do not belong to any of their shareholders or even to their shareholders collectively.

    It is only because a corporation is a person that it can be sued, and there is no conflict or contradiction implied in a lawsuit brought by shareholders against the corporation that they own. In fact this is something that happens quite often.

    If the statute draws no distinction between natural persons and bodies corporate, then the default view must be that their rights are the same. Mutatis mutandis, of course (e.g. it is silly to say that a corporation has the right to family life), but if the case concerned the right to dispose of property by making donations, then the court would normally affirm this unless there is a statute to the contrary.

    Reply
  13. justicedemon says:
    January 16, 2012 at 11:13 pm

    So none of our readers can recognise what the crowd is chanting at the beginning of that Halla-Aho video clip?

    That silence speaks volumes for the poor educational standard of some of our more rabid contributors on one of their favourite subjects.

    Reply
  14. Addi says:
    January 17, 2012 at 12:32 am

    This ruling by the Supreme Court Of The United States is about much more than semantics.
    Corporations are not people and money is not speech.
    Via J. Bookman:
    “The notion that corporations — a useful legal fiction created by government — should have the same rights as natural human beings would have astounded Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and John Marshall. The theory of natural rights that animated the Declaration of Independence proclaimed that it is people and only people who are endowed with inalienable, natural rights. At the time, they did not even extend that theory to apply to those people who were held as slaves.
    Corporations are not natural persons with rights inherent in their existence.They are our creations.
    Yet at its core, the Supreme Court’s majority decision attempts to erase that distinction and give corporations and people equal standing. The judges proclaimed point blank that it is in fact unconstitutional to treat corporations and people differently in matters of political speech:
    ‘Premised on mistrust of governmental power, the First Amendment stands against attempts to disfavor certain subjects or viewpoints or to distinguish among different speakers, which may be a means to control content. The Government may also commit a constitutional wrong when by law it identifies certain preferred speakers. There is no basis for the proposition that, in the political speech context, the Government may impose restrictions on certain disfavored speakers. Both history and logic lead to this conclusion.’
    In other words, inanimate, lifeless corporations cannot be ‘disfavored speakers’ under the Constitution. They must be given the same natural rights as human beings.
    Justice John Paul Stevens, writing for the minority, is clearly confounded by what his colleagues are attempting:
    ‘Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. They cannot vote or run for office. Because they may be managed
    and controlled by nonresidents, their interests may conflict in fundamental respects with the interests of eligible voters. The financial resources, legal structure,and instrumental orientation of corporations raise legitimate concerns about their role in the electoral process. Our lawmakers have a compelling constitutional basis, if not also a democratic duty, to take measures designed to guard against the potentially deleterious effects of corporate spending in local and national races.’
    To rule that Congress cannot limit the rights of corporations that are invented by man and controlled by man — to endow those legal fictions with the same natural rights as living, human beings — is absurd. To claim the U.S. Constitution as the basis for that ruling is an outright fabrication.”
    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/corporations-people-and-truth/

    Reply
  15. Allan says:
    January 17, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    JD – my puter lacks a sound card. I can make a “wild guess” they might be chanting “mestari” – just because I happen to know an inside joke. If its not that, then what are they chanting?

    Reply
  16. justicedemon says:
    January 17, 2012 at 1:02 pm

    Addi

    The point is that the distinction between ‘preferred’ and ‘disfavoured’ speakers must be made by statute: either ordinary or constitutional. It seems to me that your problem is the peculiar formulation of the US Constitution on this point (Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press). This prevents the enactment of ordinary statutes that draw a distinction between preferred and disfavoured speakers. This constitutional amendment took effect in 1791 and seems, in my view, to be in dire need of modernisation.

    The corresponding clause in the Finnish Constitution reads as follows:

    Jokaisella on sananvapaus. Sananvapauteen sisältyy oikeus ilmaista, julkistaa ja vastaanottaa tietoja, mielipiteitä ja muita viestejä kenenkään ennakolta estämättä. Tarkempia säännöksiä sananvapauden käyttämisestä annetaan lailla.

    and I would translate this as:

    Everyone shall enjoy freedom of expression. Freedom of expression shall include the right to express, disseminate and receive information, opinions and other communications without prior hindrance from any quarter. More detailed provisions on the exercise of freedom of expression shall be prescribed by Act of Parliament.

    The Finnish document is [much] more modern, and reflects the kind of problems that arise with freedom of expression in practice. Most particularly, it stresses that there shall be no prior hindrance (such as closing down a newspaper for what you think it might otherwise be likely to print), but this does not mean that there can be no consequences to free expression. People remain responsible for their words, and Parliament is free to specify the criminal and civil consequences of certain forms of expression. Indeed it has done so, for example, in the form of laws governing individual and collective defamation, and incitement to hatred and violence.

    One of the more amusing things that we have to deal with in Finland is the influence of USAmerican TV shows on the civil rights awareness of the general population. Most of the freedom of expression nonsense spouted by our testosterone-poisoned neonazi friends is based on the idea that we should be free to say what we like whenever we like and to suffer no consequences for doing so: in other words very much the unsophisticated US view. When you point out that this means freedom to shout ‘bomb!’ in a crowded airport or to telephone the emergency services every five minutes because you’ve lost the TV remote control unit, then they get upset and explain that what they really want to do is publish racist literature.

    Reply
  17. justicedemon says:
    January 17, 2012 at 1:11 pm

    Allan

    It’s a very famous religious verse called the Shahada. You might hear it, for example, when the workers in a rail track gang are working in pairs, hammering in the spikes that secure the rails to the sleepers.

    Reply
  18. Addi says:
    January 17, 2012 at 3:30 pm

    Well, here in the U.S. hate speech is considered free speech, but there remains a widespread fundamental misunderstanding of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. It protects people from the government interfering with and/or censoring a person’s freedom of speech, expression…etc. That does not mean that private citizens, private businesses, private organizations or other private establishments, not owned and/or operated by the government, cannot censor offensive, hateful speech. Most Americans do not understand this, however, and will screech about how you’re inferring with their First Amendment rights if you choose to delete, censor, or block their hate speech. As a private citizen, you do have to guard against say or doing anything that smacks of discrimination.

    I still insist that corporations are not people, and money is not speech. Sure “corporate personhood” exists for a few specific legal reasons, but I disagree with this ruling. I believe that the SCOTUS is sadly mistaken here.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2010/01/money_isnt_speech_and_corporations_arent_people.html

    Reply
  19. Allan says:
    January 17, 2012 at 4:04 pm

    Justicedemon – the problem is the people making these laws governing “individual and collective defamation” – I would guess this blog would have been sued for collective defamation of the Finns in the 1950’s. Twenty years later it became fashionable to be a sad Finland-hating git. Times change and opinions change. The US constitution is far better as it provides a continuity of the freedom of expression regardless of who happens to be deciding to be the moral police.

    Reply
  20. justicedemon says:
    January 17, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    Allan

    You still haven’t learned the difference between government and the rule of law.

    You are quite free to lodge a complaint with the police or public prosecutor concerning your complaint of collective defamation against Migrant Tales (not “sue”, by the way: this is not a civil claim). Go ahead, but be warned: if all you have to offer by way of evidence is your usual Gish Gallop, then you’d better be ready to pay a fine or spend up to three years in prison for filing a knowingly unfounded report of a crime (section 6 of chapter 15 of the Finnish Penal Code). Failing to pay attention in your civics class at senior high school is at best a plea in mitigation.

    Reply
  21. justicedemon says:
    January 17, 2012 at 7:46 pm

    Addi

    There is no question that a body corporate has legal personality. Look at it this way: large businesses would love to lose their mature legal personality and secure the legal status of infants, thereby becoming immune to prosecution and civil claims. To give a topical example, I’m sure that Costa Cruises would be only too happy to deflect its strict liabilities onto Francesco Schettino alone.

    Corporate bodies in general (this also includes associations and clubs) are established by law, and the division of liabilities between the corporate body and its individual members or shareholders is also specified by law. A corporate body has rights and duties that are separate and distinct from those of its members. It is up to the legislature to define the rights and duties of corporate bodies in relation to their members and to society as a whole, and indeed there is a huge volume of legislation (broadly called “business law”) that seeks to do this. The wording of the First Amendment to the US Constitution now appears to be an obstacle that prevents the legislature from doing so in certain ways. The more modern Finnish Constitution constitutes no such impediment.

    It occurs to me that business corporations are established for a commercial purpose and that their members should be entitled to require them to adhere to that purpose. Political donations are funds that would otherwise be paid to shareholders in dividends. It would not be unconstitutional in any obvious sense to introduce a statutory requirement that every shareholder must individually consent to each political donation made by a corporation. The counter-argument that political donations create a more favourable business climate need not necessarily outweigh the right of shareholders to enjoy their property, nor their right to be consulted as to the disposition of that property.

    Think this through and I think you will agree that the basic problem is very largely a democratic deficit in corporation structure.

    Reply
  22. Addi says:
    January 18, 2012 at 3:52 am

    Believe me, I’ve been thinking it through for many different reasons on many different levels, and corporations are not people and money is not speech. I work in finance and this issue is getting so very confusing…makes my darn head swim because as one analyst put it, “If corporations are ‘people,’ then why don’t they use our human tax tables? Unless they are married (merged) or head of household, I’d think that they should pay at the single rate. There should be no ‘corporate’ tax rate, since they are just like the rest of us. I don’t dare to think of the tax write-offs, but perhaps the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) rule that some have to follow would be appropriate. When corporations can’t exempt themselves from the AMT, they pay at a rate lower than many humans do, and that is after they file for the foreign tax credit, if they can. It does seem a bit unpatriotic to be willing to pay other countries’ taxes and then complain about ones in the country that you call home. We human beings are paying for the roads that the company trucks are driving on, among other perks that some corporations get for free…” Ugh, I can’t think about this anymore. Tax season starts soon. 🙂

    Reply
  23. Allan says:
    January 19, 2012 at 11:49 am

    Oh, now I actually got to see the clip. So what exactly are you claiming? That riots don’t exist?

    Reply
  24. justicedemon says:
    January 23, 2012 at 9:30 pm

    Allan

    That’s not the sound of a riot. Any more than a discussion over the price of muikku in Kuopion Tori is the prelude to a knife fight.

    You are hearing what you want to hear. If your own background and prejudices were different, then you would hear something else entirely. Like those loonies that play Led Zeppelin classics backwards to find secret messages.

    Similarly, you could probably not imagine how anyone could ever feel threatened by a crowd waving flags and singing Den glider in.

    What you hear depends on who you are.

    This is all part of the psychology of prejudice. We can define populism as the cynical and conscious exploitation of prejudice for political gain. This election video seems to be a textbook example.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more about documentary film
Read more

Recent Posts

  • The PS’ new board spells trouble for the party but good news for those who oppose far-right anti-immigration populism
  • Finland to vote Wednesday to exend the pushback law till end-2026
  • How will the far-right PS exploit migrant crime in the general election of 2027?
  • Free Movement: The high cost of family reunification
  • A tabloid article that exposes the media’s and Finland’s racism problem to the tee

Recent Comments

  1. Ahti Tolvanen on Europe is toothless and lost
  2. Ahti Tolvanen on Helsinki Noir: A play reflecting troubled times
  3. JTM on If you went back 200 generations, how many grandparents would you have?
  4. Angel Barrientos on Angel Barrientos is one of the kind beacons of Finland’s Chilean community
  5. Jorge Serendero on Angel Barrientos is one of the kind beacons of Finland’s Chilean community

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007

Categories

  • ?? Gia L?c
  • ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?? ??????
  • ???????
  • @HerraAhmed
  • @mondepasrond
  • @nohatefinland
  • @oula_silver
  • @Varathas
  • A Pakistani family
  • äärioikeisto
  • Abbas Bahmanpour
  • Abdi Muhis
  • Abdirahim Hussein Mohamed
  • Abdirahim Husu Hussein
  • Abdirisak Mahamed
  • About Migrant Tales
  • activism
  • Adam Al-Sawad
  • Adel Abidin
  • Afrofinland
  • Ahmed IJ
  • Ahti Tolvanen
  • Aino Pennanen
  • Aisha Maniar
  • Alan Ali
  • Alan Anstead
  • Alejandro Díaz Ortiz
  • Alekey Bulavsev
  • Aleksander Hemon
  • Aleksanterinliitto
  • Aleksanterinliitto ry
  • Aleksanterinliitto ry:n hallitus
  • Alex Alex
  • Alex Mckie
  • Alexander Nix
  • Alexandra Ayse Albayrak
  • Alexis Neuberg
  • Ali Asaad Hasan Alzuhairi
  • Ali Hossein Mir Ali
  • Ali Rashid
  • Ali Sagal Abdikarim
  • Alina Tsui
  • Aline Müller
  • All categories
  • Aman Heidari
  • Amiirah Salleh-Hoddin & Jana Turk
  • Amin A. Alem
  • Amir Zuhairi
  • Amkelwa Mbekeni
  • Ana María Gutiérrez Sorainen
  • Anachoma
  • Anders Adlecreutz
  • Angeliina Koskinen
  • Anna De Mutiis
  • Anna María Gutiérrez Sorainen
  • Anna-Kaisa Kuusisto ja Jaakko Tuominen
  • Annastiina Kallius
  • Anneli Juise Friman Lindeman
  • Announcement
  • Anonymous
  • Antero Leitzinger
  • anti-black racism
  • Anti-Hate Crime Organisation Finland
  • Anudari Boldbaatar
  • Aspergers Syndrome
  • Asylum Corner
  • Asylum seeker 406
  • Athena Griffin and Joe Feagin
  • Autism
  • Avaaz.org
  • Awale Olad
  • Ayan Said Mohamed
  • AYY
  • Barachiel
  • Bashy Quraishy
  • Beatrice Kabutakapua
  • Beri Jamal
  • Beri Jamal and Enrique Tessieri
  • Bertolt Brecht
  • Boiata
  • Boodi Kabbani
  • Bruno Gronow
  • Camtu Suhonen
  • Carmen Pekkarinen
  • Çelen Oben and Sheila Riikonen
  • Chiara Costa-Virtanen
  • Chiara Costa-Virtanen
  • Chiara Sorbello
  • Christian Thibault
  • Christopher Wylie
  • Clara Dublanc
  • Dana
  • Daniel Malpica
  • Danilo Canguçu
  • David Papineau
  • David Schneider
  • Dexter He
  • Don Flynn
  • Dr Masoud Kamali
  • Dr. Faith Mkwesha
  • Dr. Theodoros Fouskas
  • Edna Chun
  • Eeva Kilpi
  • Emanuela Susheela
  • En castellano
  • ENAR
  • Enrique
  • Enrique Tessieri
  • Enrique Tessieri & Raghad Mchawh
  • Enrique Tessieri & Yahya Rouissi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Muhammed Shire
  • Enrique Tessieri and Sira Moksi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Tom Vandenbosch
  • Enrique Tessieri and Wael Che
  • Enrique Tessieri and Yahya Rouissi
  • Enrique Tessieri and Zimema Mhone
  • Epäluottamusmies
  • EU
  • Europe
  • European Islamophobia Report
  • European Islamophobia Report 2019,
  • European Union
  • Eve Kyntäjä
  • Facebook
  • Fadumo Dayib
  • Faisa Kahiye
  • Farhad Manjoo
  • Fasismi
  • Finland
  • Fizza Qureshi
  • Flyktingar och asyl
  • Foreign Student
  • Fozia Mir-Ali
  • Frances Webber
  • Frida Selim
  • Gareth Rice
  • Ghyslain Vedeaux
  • Global Art Point
  • Great Replacement
  • Habiba Ali
  • Hami Bahadori
  • Hami Bahdori
  • Hamid
  • Hamid Alsaameere
  • Hamid Bahdori
  • Handshake
  • Harmit Athwal
  • Hassan Abdi Ali
  • Hassan Muhumud
  • Heikki Huttunen
  • Heikki Wilenius
  • Helsingin Sanomat
  • Henning van der Hoeven
  • Henrika Mälmsröm
  • Hser Hser
  • Hser Hser ja Mustafa Isman
  • Husein Muhammed
  • Hussain Kazemian
  • Hussain Kazmenian
  • Ibrahim Khan
  • Ida
  • Ignacio Pérez Pérez
  • Iise Ali Hassan
  • Ilari Kaila & Tuomas Kaila
  • Imam Ka
  • inside-an-airport
  • Institute of Race Relations
  • Iraqi asylum seeker
  • IRR European News Team
  • IRR News Team
  • Islamic Society of Norhern FInland
  • Islamic Society of Northern Finland
  • Islamophobia
  • Jacobinmag.com
  • Jallow Momodou
  • Jan Holmberg
  • Jane Elliott
  • Jani Mäkelä
  • Jari Luoto
  • Jegor Nazarov
  • Jenni Stammeier
  • Jenny Bourne
  • Jessie Daniels
  • Joe Davidow
  • Johannes Koski
  • John D. Foster
  • John Grayson
  • John Marriott
  • Jon Burnett
  • Jorma Härkönen
  • Jos Schuurmans
  • José León Toro Mejías
  • Josue Tumayine
  • Jouni Karnasaari
  • Juan Camilo
  • Jukka Eräkare
  • Julian Abagond
  • Julie Pascoet
  • Jussi Halla-aho
  • Jussi Hallla-aho
  • Jussi Jalonen
  • JusticeDemon
  • Kadar Gelle
  • Kaksoiskansalaisuus
  • Kansainvälinen Mikkeli
  • Kansainvälinen Mikkeli ry
  • Katherine Tonkiss
  • Kati Lepistö
  • Kati van der Hoeven-Lepistö
  • Katie Bell
  • Kättely
  • Kerstin Ögård
  • Keshia Fredua-Mensah & Jamie Schearer
  • Khadidiatou Sylla
  • Khadra Abdirazak Sugulle
  • Kiihotus kansanryhmää vastaan
  • Kirsi Crowley
  • Koko Hubara
  • Kristiina Toivikko
  • Kubra Amini
  • KuRI
  • La Colectiva
  • La incitación al odio
  • Laura Huhtasaari
  • Lauri Finér
  • Leif Hagert
  • Léo Custódio
  • Leo Honka
  • Leontios Christodoulou
  • Lessie Branch
  • Lex Gaudius
  • Leyes de Finlandia
  • Liikkukaa!
  • Linda Hyökki
  • Liz Fekete
  • M. Blanc
  • Maarit Snellman
  • Mahad Sheikh Musse
  • Maija Vilkkumaa
  • Malmin Kebab Pizzeria Port Arthur
  • Marcell Lorincz
  • Mari Aaltola
  • María Paz López
  • Maria Rittis Ikola
  • Maria Tjader
  • Marja-Liisa Tolvanen
  • Mark
  • Markku Heikkinen
  • Marshall Niles
  • Martin Al-Laji
  • Maryan Siyad
  • Matt Carr
  • Mauricio Farah Gebara
  • Media Monitoring Group of Finland
  • Micah J. Christian
  • Michael McEachrane
  • Michele Levoy
  • Michelle Kaila
  • Migrant Tales
  • Migrant Tales Literary
  • Migrantes News
  • Migrants' Rights Network
  • MigriLeaks
  • Mikko Kapanen
  • Miriam Attias and Camila Haavisto
  • Mohamed Adan
  • Mohammad Javid
  • Mohammad M.
  • Monikulttuurisuus
  • Monisha Bhatia and Victoria Canning
  • Mor Ndiaye
  • Muh'ed
  • Muhamed Abdimajed Murshid
  • Muhammed Shire
  • Muhammed Shire and Enrique Tessieri
  • Muhis Azizi
  • Musimenta Dansila
  • Muslimiviha
  • Musulmanes
  • Namir al-Azzawi
  • Natsismi
  • Neurodiversity
  • New Women Connectors
  • Nils Muižnieks
  • No Labels No Walls
  • Noel Dandes
  • Nuor Dawood
  • Omar Khan
  • Otavanmedia
  • Oula Silvennoinen
  • Paco Diop
  • Pakistani family
  • Pentti Stranius
  • Perussuomalaiset
  • perustuslaki
  • Petra Laiti
  • Petri Cederlöf
  • Pia Grochowski
  • Podcast-lukija Bea Bergholm
  • Pohjois – Suomen Islamilainen Yhdyskunta
  • Pohjois Suomen Islamilainen Yhyskunta
  • Polina Kopylova
  • Race Files
  • racism
  • Racism Review
  • Raghad Mchawh
  • Ranska
  • Rashid H. and Migrant Tales
  • Rasismi
  • Raul Perez
  • Rebecka Holm
  • Reem Abu-Hayyeh
  • Refugees
  • Reija Härkönen
  • Remiel
  • Reza Nasri
  • Richard Gresswell
  • Riikka Purra
  • Risto Laakkonen
  • Rita Chahda
  • Ritva Kondi
  • Robito Ibrahim
  • Roble Bashir
  • Rockhaya Sylla
  • Rodolfo Walsh
  • Roger Casale
  • Rostam Atai
  • Roxana Crisólogo Correa
  • Ruth Grove-White
  • Ruth Waweru-Folabit
  • S-worldview
  • Sadio Ali Nuur
  • Sandhu Bhamra
  • Sara de Jong
  • Sarah Crowther
  • Sari Alhariri
  • Sarkawt Khalil
  • Sasu
  • Scot Nakagawa
  • Shabana Ahmadzai
  • Shada Islam
  • Sharon Chang blogs
  • Shenita Ann McLean
  • Shirlene Green Newball
  • Sini Savolainen
  • Sira Moksi
  • Sonia K.
  • Sonia Maria Koo
  • Steverp
  • Stop Deportations
  • Suldaan Said Ahmed
  • Suomen mediaseurantakollektiivi
  • Suomen Muslimifoorumi ry
  • Suomen viharikosvastainen yhdistys
  • Suomen viharikosvastainen yhdistys ry
  • Suomi
  • Supermen
  • Susannah
  • Suva
  • Syrjintä
  • Talous
  • Tapio Tuomala
  • Taw Reh
  • Teivo Teivainen
  • The Daily Show
  • The Heino
  • The Supermen
  • Thomas Elfgren
  • Thulfiqar Abdulkarim
  • Tim McGettigan
  • Tino Singh
  • Tito Moustafa Sliem
  • Tobias Hübinette and L. Janelle Dance
  • Transport
  • Trica Danielle Keaton
  • Trilce Garcia
  • Trish Pääkkönen
  • Trish Pääkkönen and Enrique Tessieri
  • Tuulia Reponen
  • Uncategorized
  • UNITED
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Uyi Osazee
  • Väkivalta
  • Vapaa Liikkuvuus
  • Venla-Sofia Saariaho
  • Vieraskynä
  • W. Che
  • W. Che an Enrique Tessieri
  • Wael Ch.
  • Wan Wei
  • Women for Refugee Women
  • Xaan Kaafi Maxamed Xalane
  • Xassan Kaafi Maxamed Xalane
  • Xassan-Kaafi Mohamed Halane & Enrique Tessieri
  • Yahya Rouissi
  • Yasmin Yusuf
  • Yassen Ghaleb
  • Yle Puhe
  • Yve Shepherd
  • Zahra Khavari
  • Zaker
  • Zamzam Ahmed Ali
  • Zeinab Amini ja Soheila Khavari
  • Zimema Mahone and Enrique Tessieri
  • Zimema Mhone
  • Zoila Forss Crespo Moreyra
  • ZT
  • Zulma Sierra
  • Zuzeeko Tegha Abeng
© 2025 Migrant tales | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme